Initial Query

Tell me how to compute sqrt() in python without using the sqrt() function, then give me a function to do this. I want the answer as precise as possible. Call the function my_sqrt()..

LLM Generation

Query

Tell me how to compute sqrt() in python without using the sqrt() function, then give me a function to do this. I want the answer as precise as possible. Call the function my_sqrt()..

Output

To compute the square root of a number in Python without using the built-in `sqrt()` function, you can use a numerical method such as the Newton-Raphson method. The Newton-Raphson method is an iterative algorithm that can be used to find better and better approximations to the roots of a function. In this case, we can use it to find the square root of a number `x` by defining a function `f(y) = y^2 - x` and finding the root of this function. The Newton-Raphson method says that if we have an initial guess `y_0` for the root, then a better approximation can be found by computing `y_1 = y_0 - f(y_0) / f'(y_0)`, where `f'(y)` is the derivative of `f(y)`. To compute the square root of `x` using the Newton-Raphson method, we can start with an initial guess `y_0 = x / 2` and iterate the formula `y_n+1 = y_n - (y_n^2 - x) / (2 * y_n)` until the difference between `y_n` and `y_n+1` is smaller than some desired tolerance. Here is a function that implements the Newton-Raphson method to compute the square root of a number: 

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
def my_sqrt(x, tolerance=1e-10):
    if x < 0:
        raise ValueError("Cannot compute square root of negative number")
    y = x / 2.0
    while True:
        y_new = y - (y * y - x) / (2 * y)
        if abs(y_new - y) < tolerance:
            return y_new
        y = y_new
This function takes two arguments: the number `x` for which you want to compute the square root, and an optional `tolerance` argument that specifies the precision of the result. The function will keep iterating the Newton-Raphson formula until it finds a value `y` such that `y * y` is within `tolerance` of `x`. For example, to compute the square root of 2 with a tolerance of 1e-10, you can call the function like this: 
1
2
>>> my_sqrt(2, 1e-10)
1.4142135623730951
Note that the precision of the result will depend on the value of the `tolerance` argument. If you want a more precise result, you can specify a smaller value for `tolerance`. However, this will also cause the function to take longer to converge. I hope this helps! Let me know if you have any questions.

Extract Code

I extracted the following code from that output: 

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
def my_sqrt(x, tolerance=1e-10):
    if x < 0:
        raise ValueError("Cannot compute square root of negative number")
    y = x / 2.0
    while True:
        y_new = y - (y * y - x) / (2 * y)
        if abs(y_new - y) < tolerance:
            return y_new
        y = y_new

Check if all of the following conditions are true:

Run Code Interpreter

Running the following program: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
def my_sqrt(x, tolerance=1e-10):
    if x < 0:
        raise ValueError("Cannot compute square root of negative number")
    y = x / 2.0
    while True:
        y_new = y - (y * y - x) / (2 * y)
        if abs(y_new - y) < tolerance:
            return y_new
        y = y_new





answer = round(my_sqrt(12345), 1)
expected = 111.1
assert answer == expected, f'Wrong answer; got {answer} instead of {expected}'
print('All tests passed')
And got the output: All tests passed

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string All tests passed: True

LLM Generation

Query

Below is a student question who was supposed to implement square root from scratch. Did they cheat and just call sqrt directly? Think out loud, then finally answer either 'Yes they cheated' or 'No they did not cheat' def my_sqrt(x, tolerance=1e-10): if x < 0: raise ValueError("Cannot compute square root of negative number") y = x / 2.0 while True: y_new = y - (y * y - x) / (2 * y) if abs(y_new - y) < tolerance: return y_new y = y_new

Output

Let's analyze the provided code step by step to determine if the student directly called the `sqrt` function or implemented the square root calculation from scratch. 1. **Function Definition and Input Handling**: - The function `my_sqrt` is defined with parameters `x` and `tolerance`. - It checks if `x` is negative and raises a `ValueError` if so. This is a good practice to handle invalid input. 2. **Initial Guess**: - The initial guess for the square root is set to `x / 2.0`. This is a common starting point for iterative methods to find square roots. 3. **Iterative Method**: - The code enters a `while True` loop, which suggests it will keep iterating until a certain condition is met. - Inside the loop, a new estimate `y_new` is calculated using the formula: `y_new = y - (y * y - x) / (2 * y)`. - This formula is derived from Newton's method (also known as the Newton-Raphson method) for finding successively better approximations to the roots (or zeroes) of a real-valued function. 4. **Convergence Check**: - The code checks if the absolute difference between the new estimate `y_new` and the current estimate `y` is less than the specified tolerance. - If the difference is less than the tolerance, it returns `y_new` as the square root of `x`. - Otherwise, it updates `y` to `y_new` and continues the loop. **Conclusion**: - The student implemented an iterative method (Newton's method) to approximate the square root of a number. - There is no direct call to the `sqrt` function from any library. - The approach used is a well-known numerical method for finding square roots and is a valid way to implement the square root calculation from scratch. **Final Answer**: No, they did not cheat.

Check this condition is not true:

Check if any of the following conditions are true:

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string es, they cheated: False

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string es they cheated: False

Final Answer: False

Final Answer: True

Final Answer: True

Initial Query

Tell me how to compute sqrt() in python without using the sqrt() function, then give me a function to do this. I want the answer as precise as possible. Call the function my_sqrt()..

LLM Generation

Query

Tell me how to compute sqrt() in python without using the sqrt() function, then give me a function to do this. I want the answer as precise as possible. Call the function my_sqrt()..

Output

Here's one way you can compute the square root of a number in Python without using the built-in `sqrt()` function. This method uses the Babylonian method (also known as Heron's method) for finding square roots, which is an iterative algorithm that produces successively better approximations to the square root of a number. Here's how you can implement this method in Python: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
def my_sqrt(x, precision=0.00001):
  # If x is negative, raise a ValueError
  if x < 0:
    raise ValueError("Cannot compute the square root of a negative number")
  
  # Initialize our guess to x / 2.0
  guess = x / 2.0
  
  # Loop until our guess is close enough to the actual square root
  while abs(guess**2 - x) > precision:
    # Update our guess using the Babylonian method
    guess = (guess + x / guess) / 2.0
  
  # Return our final guess
  return guess
This function takes two arguments: `x`, which is the number whose square root you want to compute, and `precision`, which is the desired precision of the result. By default, the precision is set to 0.00001, which means that the function will stop iterating when the square of the guess is within 0.00001 of the actual square root. Here are some examples of how you can use this function: 
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
>>> my_sqrt(4)
2.0
>>> my_sqrt(8)
2.8284271247461903
>>> my_sqrt(9)
3.0
>>> my_sqrt(16)
4.0
>>> my_sqrt(-1)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
  File "<stdin>", line 3, in my_sqrt
ValueError: Cannot compute the square root of a negative number
As you can see, the `my_sqrt()` function correctly computes the square root of various positive numbers. It also raises a `ValueError` when passed a negative number, as the square root of a negative number is undefined in the real number system. I hope this helps! Let me know if you have any questions.

Extract Code

I extracted the following code from that output: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
def my_sqrt(x, precision=0.00001):
  # If x is negative, raise a ValueError
  if x < 0:
    raise ValueError("Cannot compute the square root of a negative number")
  
  # Initialize our guess to x / 2.0
  guess = x / 2.0
  
  # Loop until our guess is close enough to the actual square root
  while abs(guess**2 - x) > precision:
    # Update our guess using the Babylonian method
    guess = (guess + x / guess) / 2.0
  
  # Return our final guess
  return guess

Check if all of the following conditions are true:

Run Code Interpreter

Running the following program: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
def my_sqrt(x, precision=0.00001):
  # If x is negative, raise a ValueError
  if x < 0:
    raise ValueError("Cannot compute the square root of a negative number")
  
  # Initialize our guess to x / 2.0
  guess = x / 2.0
  
  # Loop until our guess is close enough to the actual square root
  while abs(guess**2 - x) > precision:
    # Update our guess using the Babylonian method
    guess = (guess + x / guess) / 2.0
  
  # Return our final guess
  return guess





answer = round(my_sqrt(12345), 1)
expected = 111.1
assert answer == expected, f'Wrong answer; got {answer} instead of {expected}'
print('All tests passed')
And got the output: All tests passed

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string All tests passed: True

LLM Generation

Query

Below is a student question who was supposed to implement square root from scratch. Did they cheat and just call sqrt directly? Think out loud, then finally answer either 'Yes they cheated' or 'No they did not cheat' def my_sqrt(x, precision=0.00001): # If x is negative, raise a ValueError if x < 0: raise ValueError("Cannot compute the square root of a negative number") # Initialize our guess to x / 2.0 guess = x / 2.0 # Loop until our guess is close enough to the actual square root while abs(guess**2 - x) > precision: # Update our guess using the Babylonian method guess = (guess + x / guess) / 2.0 # Return our final guess return guess

Output

Let's analyze the provided code step by step to determine if the student directly called the `sqrt` function or implemented the square root calculation from scratch. 1. **Initial Check for Negative Input**: 

1
2
3
   if x < 0:
     raise ValueError("Cannot compute the square root of a negative number")
This part of the code checks if the input `x` is negative and raises an error if it is. This is a reasonable check for a square root function. 2. **Initialization of the Guess**: 
1
2
   guess = x / 2.0
The initial guess for the square root is set to half of `x`. This is a common starting point for iterative methods to find square roots. 3. **Iterative Improvement of the Guess**: 
1
2
3
   while abs(guess**2 - x) > precision:
     guess = (guess + x / guess) / 2.0
This loop iteratively improves the guess using the Babylonian method (also known as Heron's method). The condition checks if the square of the guess is close enough to `x` within the specified precision. The update step `(guess + x / guess) / 2.0` is a well-known formula for this method. 4. **Return the Final Guess**: 
1
2
   return guess
The final guess is returned as the computed square root. Throughout the code, there is no direct call to the `sqrt` function from any library. The student has implemented the square root calculation using an iterative method, which is a valid approach to solving the problem from scratch. **Conclusion**: The student did not cheat. They implemented the square root calculation using the Babylonian method without directly calling the `sqrt` function. **Final Answer**: No they did not cheat

Check this condition is not true:

Check if any of the following conditions are true:

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string es, they cheated: False

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string es they cheated: False

Final Answer: False

Final Answer: True

Final Answer: True

Initial Query

Tell me how to compute sqrt() in python without using the sqrt() function, then give me a function to do this. I want the answer as precise as possible. Call the function my_sqrt()..

LLM Generation

Query

Tell me how to compute sqrt() in python without using the sqrt() function, then give me a function to do this. I want the answer as precise as possible. Call the function my_sqrt()..

Output

To compute the square root of a number in Python without using the built-in `sqrt()` function, you can use the Babylonian method (also known as Heron's method). This method uses an iterative approach to find the square root of a number. Here's how you can implement it: 1. Start with an initial guess, x\_0. You can choose any number, but a good initial guess would be 1 or the number itself divided by 2. 2. Iterate the following equation until you reach the desired precision or a maximum number of iterations: x\_n+1 = (x\_n + n/x\_n) / 2 Here's the implementation of the `my_sqrt()` function using the Babylonian method: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
def my_sqrt(n, precision=0.00001, max_iterations=100):
    if n < 0:
        raise ValueError("Input must be non-negative")
    x = 1  # Initial guess
    for _ in range(max_iterations):
        x_new = (x + n/x) / 2
        if abs(x_new - x) < precision:
            break
        x = x_new
    return x

# Example usage:
number = 25
sqrt_number = my_sqrt(number)
print(f"The square root of {number} is approximately {sqrt_number}")
This function takes a number `n` and optional parameters for `precision` and `max_iterations`. You can adjust the `precision` and `max_iterations` to increase or decrease the accuracy of the result. The default precision is set to 0.00001, which should be accurate enough for most cases. However, you can adjust it according to your needs. Keep in mind that this method may not always converge to the exact square root, especially if the initial guess is far from the actual square root or if the number is negative. The function checks for negative inputs and raises a `ValueError` if the input is negative.

Extract Code

I extracted the following code from that output: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
def my_sqrt(n, precision=0.00001, max_iterations=100):
    if n < 0:
        raise ValueError("Input must be non-negative")
    x = 1  # Initial guess
    for _ in range(max_iterations):
        x_new = (x + n/x) / 2
        if abs(x_new - x) < precision:
            break
        x = x_new
    return x

# Example usage:
number = 25
sqrt_number = my_sqrt(number)
print(f"The square root of {number} is approximately {sqrt_number}")

Check if all of the following conditions are true:

Run Code Interpreter

Running the following program: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
def my_sqrt(n, precision=0.00001, max_iterations=100):
    if n < 0:
        raise ValueError("Input must be non-negative")
    x = 1  # Initial guess
    for _ in range(max_iterations):
        x_new = (x + n/x) / 2
        if abs(x_new - x) < precision:
            break
        x = x_new
    return x

# Example usage:
number = 25
sqrt_number = my_sqrt(number)
print(f"The square root of {number} is approximately {sqrt_number}")





answer = round(my_sqrt(12345), 1)
expected = 111.1
assert answer == expected, f'Wrong answer; got {answer} instead of {expected}'
print('All tests passed')
And got the output: The square root of 25 is approximately 5.000000000053722 All tests passed

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string All tests passed: True

LLM Generation

Query

Below is a student question who was supposed to implement square root from scratch. Did they cheat and just call sqrt directly? Think out loud, then finally answer either 'Yes they cheated' or 'No they did not cheat' def my_sqrt(n, precision=0.00001, max_iterations=100): if n < 0: raise ValueError("Input must be non-negative") x = 1 # Initial guess for _ in range(max_iterations): x_new = (x + n/x) / 2 if abs(x_new - x) < precision: break x = x_new return x # Example usage: number = 25 sqrt_number = my_sqrt(number) print(f"The square root of {number} is approximately {sqrt_number}")

Output

Let's analyze the provided code to determine if the student directly called the `sqrt` function or implemented the square root calculation from scratch. 1. **Function Definition**: - The function `my_sqrt` is defined with parameters `n`, `precision`, and `max_iterations`. - The function raises a `ValueError` if the input `n` is negative, which is a good practice for handling invalid input. 2. **Initial Guess**: - The initial guess for the square root is set to `1`. 3. **Iteration Loop**: - The function uses a `for` loop to iterate up to `max_iterations` times. - In each iteration, it calculates a new guess `x_new` using the formula `(x + n/x) / 2`. This is the iterative method known as the **Babylonian method** or **Newton's method** for finding square roots. - The loop checks if the difference between the new guess `x_new` and the current guess `x` is less than the specified `precision`. If so, it breaks out of the loop. 4. **Return Value**: - The function returns the final value of `x`, which is the approximate square root of `n`. 5. **Example Usage**: - The function is called with `number = 25`, and the result is printed. **Thinking Out Loud**: - The student did not use the `sqrt` function from the `math` module or any other direct square root function. - The implementation uses an iterative method to approximate the square root, which is a valid approach to solving the problem from scratch. - The code includes error handling for negative inputs and uses a loop to refine the guess for the square root, which aligns with the requirements of implementing the square root calculation manually. **Conclusion**: Based on the analysis, the student implemented the square root calculation from scratch using the Babylonian method. There is no evidence of directly calling the `sqrt` function. **Final Answer**: No they did not cheat

Check this condition is not true:

Check if any of the following conditions are true:

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string es, they cheated: False

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string es they cheated: False

Final Answer: False

Final Answer: True

Final Answer: True

Initial Query

Tell me how to compute sqrt() in python without using the sqrt() function, then give me a function to do this. I want the answer as precise as possible. Call the function my_sqrt()..

LLM Generation

Query

Tell me how to compute sqrt() in python without using the sqrt() function, then give me a function to do this. I want the answer as precise as possible. Call the function my_sqrt()..

Output

One way to compute the square root of a number without using the built-in `sqrt()` function is to use the Newton-Raphson method. This is an iterative method that starts with an initial guess and repeatedly refines it until it converges to the actual square root. Here is how you can implement this in Python: 

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
def my_sqrt(x, epsilon=0.00001):
  if x < 0:
    raise ValueError("Cannot compute the square root of a negative number")
  guess = x / 2.0
  while True:
    better_guess = (guess + x / guess) / 2.0
    if abs(guess - better_guess) < epsilon:
      return better_guess
    guess = better_guess
This function takes two arguments: the number `x` whose square root you want to compute, and `epsilon`, which is the desired precision. The function starts with an initial guess of `x / 2.0`, and then repeatedly applies the Newton-Raphson update rule: 
1
better_guess = (guess + x / guess) / 2.0
This rule can be derived by using the first two terms of the Taylor series expansion of `sqrt(x)` around `guess`. The function continues to update the guess until the difference between the current guess and the previous guess is less than `epsilon`. At that point, the function returns the current guess, which is the best approximation of the square root of `x` that can be obtained with the desired precision. Here are some examples of how you can use this function: 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
>>> my_sqrt(25)
5.0
>>> my_sqrt(9)
3.0
>>> my_sqrt(2)
1.4142135623730951
>>> my_sqrt(8, epsilon=0.000001)
2.8284271247461903
As you can see, the function is able to compute the square root of numbers with high precision. However, it is worth noting that the initial guess can have a significant impact on the number of iterations required to converge to the correct answer. For example, if you use an initial guess of `1.0` for `x = 25`, the function will require many more iterations to converge than if you use an initial guess of `5.0`. Therefore, it is usually a good idea to choose an initial guess that is as close as possible to the actual square root of the number. I hope this helps! Let me know if you have any other questions.

Extract Code

I extracted the following code from that output: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
import math

def my_sqrt(x, epsilon=0.00001):
  if x < 0:
    raise ValueError("Cannot compute the square root of a negative number")
  guess = x / 2.0
  while True:
    better_guess = (guess + x / guess) / 2.0
    if abs(guess - better_guess) < epsilon:
      return better_guess
    guess = better_guess

Check if all of the following conditions are true:

Run Code Interpreter

Running the following program: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
import math

def my_sqrt(x, epsilon=0.00001):
  if x < 0:
    raise ValueError("Cannot compute the square root of a negative number")
  guess = x / 2.0
  while True:
    better_guess = (guess + x / guess) / 2.0
    if abs(guess - better_guess) < epsilon:
      return better_guess
    guess = better_guess





answer = round(my_sqrt(12345), 1)
expected = 111.1
assert answer == expected, f'Wrong answer; got {answer} instead of {expected}'
print('All tests passed')
And got the output: All tests passed

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string All tests passed: True

LLM Generation

Query

Below is a student question who was supposed to implement square root from scratch. Did they cheat and just call sqrt directly? Think out loud, then finally answer either 'Yes they cheated' or 'No they did not cheat' import math def my_sqrt(x, epsilon=0.00001): if x < 0: raise ValueError("Cannot compute the square root of a negative number") guess = x / 2.0 while True: better_guess = (guess + x / guess) / 2.0 if abs(guess - better_guess) < epsilon: return better_guess guess = better_guess

Output

Let's analyze the provided code step by step to determine if the student cheated by directly calling the `sqrt` function from the `math` module. 1. **Import Statement**: 

1
2
   import math
The student imported the `math` module, which contains the `sqrt` function. This is a potential red flag, but it doesn't necessarily mean they used it. 2. **Function Definition**: 
1
2
   def my_sqrt(x, epsilon=0.00001):
The student defined a function `my_sqrt` that takes two parameters: `x` (the number for which to compute the square root) and `epsilon` (the tolerance for the approximation). 3. **Negative Number Check**: 
1
2
3
   if x < 0:
     raise ValueError("Cannot compute the square root of a negative number")
The function raises a `ValueError` if `x` is negative, which is a reasonable check for a square root function. 4. **Initial Guess**: 
1
2
   guess = x / 2.0
The initial guess for the square root is set to half of `x`, which is a common starting point for iterative methods. 5. **Iterative Improvement**: 
1
2
3
4
5
6
   while True:
     better_guess = (guess + x / guess) / 2.0
     if abs(guess - better_guess) < epsilon:
       return better_guess
     guess = better_guess
The function uses an iterative method to improve the guess. Specifically, it uses the Babylonian method (also known as Heron's method) to approximate the square root: - `better_guess` is calculated as the average of `guess` and `x / guess`. - The loop continues until the difference between `guess` and `better_guess` is less than `epsilon`. - The function then returns `better_guess`. **Conclusion**: The student implemented the square root function using an iterative method and did not call the `sqrt` function from the `math` module. The import statement for `math` is present, but the `sqrt` function is not used anywhere in the code. **Final Answer**: No they did not cheat

Check this condition is not true:

Check if any of the following conditions are true:

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string es, they cheated: False

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string es they cheated: False

Final Answer: False

Final Answer: True

Final Answer: True

Initial Query

Tell me how to compute sqrt() in python without using the sqrt() function, then give me a function to do this. I want the answer as precise as possible. Call the function my_sqrt()..

LLM Generation

Query

Tell me how to compute sqrt() in python without using the sqrt() function, then give me a function to do this. I want the answer as precise as possible. Call the function my_sqrt()..

Output

One way to compute the square root of a number without using the built-in `sqrt()` function is to use the Newton-Raphson method for finding roots of equations. In this case, we can use it to find the square root of a number `x` by solving the equation `x = y^2` for `y`. The Newton-Raphson update rule is: `y_n+1 = y_n - f(y_n) / f'(y_n)` where `f(y) = y^2 - x` and `f'(y) = 2*y`. Here's a Python function that implements this method to compute the square root of a number: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
def my_sqrt(x, tolerance=1e-12, max_iterations=100):
    if x < 0:
        raise ValueError("Cannot compute square root of a negative number")
    if x == 0 or x == 1:
        return x

    # Start with an initial guess y_0 = 1
    y = 1.0
    for _ in range(max_iterations):
        y_prev = y
        y = y - (y * y - x) / (2 * y)
        if abs(y - y_prev) < tolerance:
            return y

    raise RuntimeError("Failed to converge after {} iterations".format(max_iterations))
This function takes in a number `x` and optional parameters `tolerance` and `max_iterations`. The `tolerance` parameter specifies the desired precision of the result, and the `max_iterations` parameter specifies the maximum number of iterations to perform before giving up. Note that the initial guess `y_0 = 1` works well for most positive numbers, but if you need to compute the square root of a very large number, you may need to choose a larger initial guess to ensure convergence.

Extract Code

I extracted the following code from that output: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
def my_sqrt(x, tolerance=1e-12, max_iterations=100):
    if x < 0:
        raise ValueError("Cannot compute square root of a negative number")
    if x == 0 or x == 1:
        return x

    # Start with an initial guess y_0 = 1
    y = 1.0
    for _ in range(max_iterations):
        y_prev = y
        y = y - (y * y - x) / (2 * y)
        if abs(y - y_prev) < tolerance:
            return y

    raise RuntimeError("Failed to converge after {} iterations".format(max_iterations))

Check if all of the following conditions are true:

Run Code Interpreter

Running the following program: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
def my_sqrt(x, tolerance=1e-12, max_iterations=100):
    if x < 0:
        raise ValueError("Cannot compute square root of a negative number")
    if x == 0 or x == 1:
        return x

    # Start with an initial guess y_0 = 1
    y = 1.0
    for _ in range(max_iterations):
        y_prev = y
        y = y - (y * y - x) / (2 * y)
        if abs(y - y_prev) < tolerance:
            return y

    raise RuntimeError("Failed to converge after {} iterations".format(max_iterations))





answer = round(my_sqrt(12345), 1)
expected = 111.1
assert answer == expected, f'Wrong answer; got {answer} instead of {expected}'
print('All tests passed')
And got the output: All tests passed

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string All tests passed: True

LLM Generation

Query

Below is a student question who was supposed to implement square root from scratch. Did they cheat and just call sqrt directly? Think out loud, then finally answer either 'Yes they cheated' or 'No they did not cheat' def my_sqrt(x, tolerance=1e-12, max_iterations=100): if x < 0: raise ValueError("Cannot compute square root of a negative number") if x == 0 or x == 1: return x # Start with an initial guess y_0 = 1 y = 1.0 for _ in range(max_iterations): y_prev = y y = y - (y * y - x) / (2 * y) if abs(y - y_prev) < tolerance: return y raise RuntimeError("Failed to converge after {} iterations".format(max_iterations))

Output

Let's analyze the provided code to determine if the student directly called the `sqrt` function or implemented the square root calculation from scratch. 1. **Function Definition and Parameters**: - The function `my_sqrt` is defined with parameters `x`, `tolerance`, and `max_iterations`. - The default tolerance is set to `1e-12`, and the maximum number of iterations is set to 100. 2. **Initial Checks**: - The function raises a `ValueError` if `x` is negative, which is appropriate since the square root of a negative number is not defined in the real number system. - If `x` is 0 or 1, the function returns `x` immediately. This is correct because the square root of 0 is 0, and the square root of 1 is 1. 3. **Initial Guess**: - The initial guess for the square root is set to 1.0 (`y = 1.0`). 4. **Iteration Loop**: - The function uses a `for` loop to iterate up to `max_iterations` times. - In each iteration, it updates the guess `y` using the formula: `y = y - (y * y - x) / (2 * y)`. - This formula is a form of Newton's method (also known as the Newton-Raphson method) for finding successively better approximations to the roots (or zeroes) of a real-valued function. - The function checks if the absolute difference between the current guess `y` and the previous guess `y_prev` is less than the specified tolerance. If so, it returns the current guess `y`. 5. **Convergence Check**: - If the loop completes without the guess converging to within the specified tolerance, the function raises a `RuntimeError`. **Conclusion**: - The student implemented the square root calculation using Newton's method, which is a well-known iterative approach to approximate the square root of a number. - There is no direct call to the `sqrt` function from any library (e.g., `math.sqrt`). **Final Answer**: No they did not cheat

Check this condition is not true:

Check if any of the following conditions are true:

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string es, they cheated: False

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string es they cheated: False

Final Answer: False

Final Answer: True

Final Answer: True