Initial Query

Tell me how to compute sqrt() in python without using the sqrt() function, then give me a function to do this. I want the answer as precise as possible. Call the function my_sqrt()..

LLM Generation

Query

Tell me how to compute sqrt() in python without using the sqrt() function, then give me a function to do this. I want the answer as precise as possible. Call the function my_sqrt()..

Output

Certainly! To calculate the square root of a number without using the built-in `sqrt()` function in Python, you can use the Newton-Raphson method (also known as Heron's method). This is an iterative method that converges to the correct result quite quickly. Here's a step-by-step explanation of the Newton-Raphson method for finding the square root of a number \( x \): 1. Start with an initial guess \( g \). A common choice is \( g = x / 2 \). 2. Improve the guess \( g \) using the formula: \[ g = \frac{g + \frac{x}{g}}{2} \] 3. Repeat step 2 until the difference between successive guesses is smaller than a predefined tolerance level. Here is a Python function `my_sqrt` that implements this method: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
def my_sqrt(x, tolerance=1e-10):
    if x < 0:
        raise ValueError("Cannot compute the square root of a negative number.")
    if x == 0:
        return 0

    guess = x / 2.0
    while True:
        new_guess = (guess + x / guess) / 2.0
        if abs(new_guess - guess) < tolerance:
            return new_guess
        guess = new_guess

# Example usage:
print(my_sqrt(25))  # Should print a number close to 5
print(my_sqrt(2))   # Should print a number close to 1.41421356237
### Explanation: - The function `my_sqrt` takes two arguments: `x` (the number you want the square root of) and `tolerance` (the precision level you desire). - It checks if `x` is less than 0, raising a `ValueError` since the square root of a negative number is not real. - It handles the special case where `x` is 0, directly returning 0. - It initializes the guess to `x / 2.0`. - In a loop, it repeatedly updates the guess using the Newton-Raphson formula and checks if the difference between the new guess and the old guess is smaller than the specified tolerance. - The loop breaks and returns the guess when the desired precision is achieved. This function will give you a very precise estimate of the square root of a given number.

Extract Code

I extracted the following code from that output: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
def my_sqrt(x, tolerance=1e-10):
    if x < 0:
        raise ValueError("Cannot compute the square root of a negative number.")
    if x == 0:
        return 0

    guess = x / 2.0
    while True:
        new_guess = (guess + x / guess) / 2.0
        if abs(new_guess - guess) < tolerance:
            return new_guess
        guess = new_guess

# Example usage:
print(my_sqrt(25))  # Should print a number close to 5
print(my_sqrt(2))   # Should print a number close to 1.41421356237

Check if all of the following conditions are true:

Run Code Interpreter

Running the following program: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
def my_sqrt(x, tolerance=1e-10):
    if x < 0:
        raise ValueError("Cannot compute the square root of a negative number.")
    if x == 0:
        return 0

    guess = x / 2.0
    while True:
        new_guess = (guess + x / guess) / 2.0
        if abs(new_guess - guess) < tolerance:
            return new_guess
        guess = new_guess

# Example usage:
print(my_sqrt(25))  # Should print a number close to 5
print(my_sqrt(2))   # Should print a number close to 1.41421356237





answer = round(my_sqrt(12345), 1)
expected = 111.1
assert answer == expected, f'Wrong answer; got {answer} instead of {expected}'
print('All tests passed')
And got the output: 5.0 1.414213562373095 All tests passed

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string All tests passed: True

LLM Generation

Query

Below is a student question who was supposed to implement square root from scratch. Did they cheat and just call sqrt directly? Think out loud, then finally answer either 'Yes they cheated' or 'No they did not cheat' def my_sqrt(x, tolerance=1e-10): if x < 0: raise ValueError("Cannot compute the square root of a negative number.") if x == 0: return 0 guess = x / 2.0 while True: new_guess = (guess + x / guess) / 2.0 if abs(new_guess - guess) < tolerance: return new_guess guess = new_guess # Example usage: print(my_sqrt(25)) # Should print a number close to 5 print(my_sqrt(2)) # Should print a number close to 1.41421356237

Output

To determine if the student cheated by directly calling a built-in `sqrt` function or not, let's analyze the provided `my_sqrt` function step by step. 1. **Initial Checks**: The function starts by checking if the input `x` is negative, throwing a `ValueError` if so, which is a good practice for a square root function. It also correctly returns 0 for an input of 0. These are logical steps and do not involve calling a built-in square root function. 2. **Initial Guess**: The function then initializes the guess for the square root as `x / 2.0`. This is a common starting point for iterative methods to find square roots, suggesting that the student is implementing an algorithm rather than using a direct call. 3. **Iterative Process**: The core of the function is an iterative process that repeatedly applies the formula `new_guess = (guess + x / guess) / 2.0`. This formula is derived from Newton's method (also known as the Newton-Raphson method) for finding successively better approximations to the roots (or zeroes) of a real-valued function. In this case, the function being approximated is `f(guess) = guess^2 - x`, where the goal is to find `guess` such that `f(guess) = 0`, meaning `guess^2 = x`. 4. **Tolerance Check**: The loop continues until the difference between successive guesses is less than a specified tolerance (`1e-10` in this case), which is a common approach to determine when an iterative calculation can stop because it has converged sufficiently close to the true answer. 5. **Return Value**: Finally, the function returns the last computed guess as the approximation of the square root of `x`. Based on this analysis, the student did not cheat by directly calling a built-in `sqrt` function. Instead, they implemented an iterative algorithm (specifically, Newton's method) to compute the square root of a given number, which is a legitimate and effective approach to solving this problem. **Answer**: No they did not cheat.

Check this condition is not true:

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string they cheated: False

Final Answer: True

Final Answer: True

Initial Query

Tell me how to compute sqrt() in python without using the sqrt() function, then give me a function to do this. I want the answer as precise as possible. Call the function my_sqrt()..

LLM Generation

Query

Tell me how to compute sqrt() in python without using the sqrt() function, then give me a function to do this. I want the answer as precise as possible. Call the function my_sqrt()..

Output

Sure, you can compute the square root of a number in Python without using the `sqrt()` function by employing an iterative method such as the Newton-Raphson method. This method is quite efficient and can give you a very precise result. Here's how you can implement it in a function called `my_sqrt()`: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
def my_sqrt(x, tolerance=1e-10):
    """
    Compute the square root of a number using the Newton-Raphson method.
    
    Parameters:
    x (float): The number to compute the square root of.
    tolerance (float): The tolerance for the convergence of the method.

    Returns:
    float: The computed square root of the number.
    """
    if x < 0:
        raise ValueError("Cannot compute the square root of a negative number")
    
    # Initial guess can be x or x/2, a reasonable starting point
    guess = x if x >= 1 else 1.0
    
    while True:
        # Calculate a better guess
        next_guess = 0.5 * (guess + x / guess)
        
        # Check for convergence within the specified tolerance
        if abs(guess - next_guess) < tolerance:
            return next_guess
        
        # Update the guess
        guess = next_guess

# Example usage:
print(my_sqrt(25))  # Should print a value close to 5
print(my_sqrt(2))   # Should print a value close to 1.41421356237
### Explanation: 1. **Initial Guess**: We start with an initial guess. If the number \(x\) is greater than or equal to 1, we start with \(x\). If \(x\) is less than 1, starting with 1 is generally a safe bet. 2. **Iterative Improvement**: In each iteration, we compute a new guess using the formula: \[ \text{next\_guess} = 0.5 \times (\text{guess} + \frac{x}{\text{guess}}) \] This is derived from the Newton-Raphson method for finding the roots of a function. 3. **Convergence Check**: We check if the absolute difference between the current guess and the next guess is smaller than a given tolerance. If it is, we consider the method to have converged and return the next guess. 4. **Update Guess**: If the method has not yet converged, we update our guess and repeat the process. ### Edge Cases: - The function raises a `ValueError` if the input number is negative since the square root of a negative number is not a real number. - For very small numbers (less than 1), starting with an initial guess of 1 ensures that the method converges properly. This implementation provides a very high precision for the square root calculation, as controlled by the `tolerance` parameter.

Extract Code

I extracted the following code from that output: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
def my_sqrt(x, tolerance=1e-10):
    """
    Compute the square root of a number using the Newton-Raphson method.
    
    Parameters:
    x (float): The number to compute the square root of.
    tolerance (float): The tolerance for the convergence of the method.

    Returns:
    float: The computed square root of the number.
    """
    if x < 0:
        raise ValueError("Cannot compute the square root of a negative number")
    
    # Initial guess can be x or x/2, a reasonable starting point
    guess = x if x >= 1 else 1.0
    
    while True:
        # Calculate a better guess
        next_guess = 0.5 * (guess + x / guess)
        
        # Check for convergence within the specified tolerance
        if abs(guess - next_guess) < tolerance:
            return next_guess
        
        # Update the guess
        guess = next_guess

# Example usage:
print(my_sqrt(25))  # Should print a value close to 5
print(my_sqrt(2))   # Should print a value close to 1.41421356237

Check if all of the following conditions are true:

Run Code Interpreter

Running the following program: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
def my_sqrt(x, tolerance=1e-10):
    """
    Compute the square root of a number using the Newton-Raphson method.
    
    Parameters:
    x (float): The number to compute the square root of.
    tolerance (float): The tolerance for the convergence of the method.

    Returns:
    float: The computed square root of the number.
    """
    if x < 0:
        raise ValueError("Cannot compute the square root of a negative number")
    
    # Initial guess can be x or x/2, a reasonable starting point
    guess = x if x >= 1 else 1.0
    
    while True:
        # Calculate a better guess
        next_guess = 0.5 * (guess + x / guess)
        
        # Check for convergence within the specified tolerance
        if abs(guess - next_guess) < tolerance:
            return next_guess
        
        # Update the guess
        guess = next_guess

# Example usage:
print(my_sqrt(25))  # Should print a value close to 5
print(my_sqrt(2))   # Should print a value close to 1.41421356237





answer = round(my_sqrt(12345), 1)
expected = 111.1
assert answer == expected, f'Wrong answer; got {answer} instead of {expected}'
print('All tests passed')
And got the output: 5.0 1.414213562373095 All tests passed

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string All tests passed: True

LLM Generation

Query

Below is a student question who was supposed to implement square root from scratch. Did they cheat and just call sqrt directly? Think out loud, then finally answer either 'Yes they cheated' or 'No they did not cheat' def my_sqrt(x, tolerance=1e-10): """ Compute the square root of a number using the Newton-Raphson method. Parameters: x (float): The number to compute the square root of. tolerance (float): The tolerance for the convergence of the method. Returns: float: The computed square root of the number. """ if x < 0: raise ValueError("Cannot compute the square root of a negative number") # Initial guess can be x or x/2, a reasonable starting point guess = x if x >= 1 else 1.0 while True: # Calculate a better guess next_guess = 0.5 * (guess + x / guess) # Check for convergence within the specified tolerance if abs(guess - next_guess) < tolerance: return next_guess # Update the guess guess = next_guess # Example usage: print(my_sqrt(25)) # Should print a value close to 5 print(my_sqrt(2)) # Should print a value close to 1.41421356237

Output

To determine if the student cheated by directly calling the `sqrt` function from a library such as `math`, we need to analyze the implementation of the `my_sqrt` function provided. The student claims to implement the square root calculation using the Newton-Raphson method. This method is an iterative numerical method for finding approximations to the roots (or zeroes) of a real-valued function. For square root calculation, the Newton-Raphson method can be specifically applied to find the root of the function \(f(x) = x^2 - S\), where \(S\) is the number whose square root we want to find, and \(x\) is an approximation of the square root. The provided code does the following: 1. It checks if the input `x` is negative, and if so, raises a `ValueError`, which is a reasonable check since the square root of a negative number is not defined in the set of real numbers. 2. It sets an initial guess for the square root. The choice of `x` or `1.0` as the initial guess is a practical one, especially considering that for `x >= 1`, `x` itself can be a reasonable starting point, and for `x < 1`, starting with `1.0` can help avoid division by very small numbers which might lead to numerical instability. 3. It enters a loop where it applies the Newton-Raphson iteration formula specifically adapted for square root calculation: `next_guess = 0.5 * (guess + x / guess)`. This formula is derived from the general Newton-Raphson update formula `x_{n+1} = x_n - f(x_n)/f'(x_n)` by substituting `f(x) = x^2 - S` and simplifying. 4. It checks if the difference between the current guess and the next guess is within a specified tolerance, which is a common way to determine convergence in numerical methods. If the difference is within the tolerance, it returns the next guess as the result. 5. If not, it updates the guess with the next guess and repeats the iteration. Given this analysis, the student's implementation does indeed follow the Newton-Raphson method for computing the square root without directly calling any built-in `sqrt` function. The code is a legitimate attempt to solve the problem as specified and demonstrates an understanding of both the Newton-Raphson method and its application to square root calculation. Final Answer: **No they did not cheat**

Check this condition is not true:

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string they cheated: False

Final Answer: True

Final Answer: True

Initial Query

Tell me how to compute sqrt() in python without using the sqrt() function, then give me a function to do this. I want the answer as precise as possible. Call the function my_sqrt()..

LLM Generation

Query

Tell me how to compute sqrt() in python without using the sqrt() function, then give me a function to do this. I want the answer as precise as possible. Call the function my_sqrt()..

Output

Certainly! You can compute the square root using methods such as the Newton-Raphson method (also known as Heron's method). This iterative approach repeatedly improves the guess for the square root. Here's how you can implement it in Python: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
def my_sqrt(x, tolerance=1e-10):
    if x < 0:
        raise ValueError("Cannot compute the square root of a negative number.")
    elif x == 0:
        return 0
    
    guess = x
    while True:
        new_guess = 0.5 * (guess + x / guess)
        if abs(new_guess - guess) < tolerance:
            return new_guess
        guess = new_guess

# Example usage:
print(my_sqrt(25))  # Should print a value close to 5
print(my_sqrt(2))   # Should print a value close to 1.414213562
This function `my_sqrt` computes the square root of a given number `x` using the Newton-Raphson method. The `tolerance` parameter determines the precision of the result; you can adjust it to make the result more or less precise. The function starts with an initial guess and iteratively improves it until the difference between successive guesses is smaller than the tolerance.

Extract Code

I extracted the following code from that output: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
def my_sqrt(x, tolerance=1e-10):
    if x < 0:
        raise ValueError("Cannot compute the square root of a negative number.")
    elif x == 0:
        return 0
    
    guess = x
    while True:
        new_guess = 0.5 * (guess + x / guess)
        if abs(new_guess - guess) < tolerance:
            return new_guess
        guess = new_guess

# Example usage:
print(my_sqrt(25))  # Should print a value close to 5
print(my_sqrt(2))   # Should print a value close to 1.414213562

Check if all of the following conditions are true:

Run Code Interpreter

Running the following program: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
def my_sqrt(x, tolerance=1e-10):
    if x < 0:
        raise ValueError("Cannot compute the square root of a negative number.")
    elif x == 0:
        return 0
    
    guess = x
    while True:
        new_guess = 0.5 * (guess + x / guess)
        if abs(new_guess - guess) < tolerance:
            return new_guess
        guess = new_guess

# Example usage:
print(my_sqrt(25))  # Should print a value close to 5
print(my_sqrt(2))   # Should print a value close to 1.414213562





answer = round(my_sqrt(12345), 1)
expected = 111.1
assert answer == expected, f'Wrong answer; got {answer} instead of {expected}'
print('All tests passed')
And got the output: 5.0 1.414213562373095 All tests passed

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string All tests passed: True

LLM Generation

Query

Below is a student question who was supposed to implement square root from scratch. Did they cheat and just call sqrt directly? Think out loud, then finally answer either 'Yes they cheated' or 'No they did not cheat' def my_sqrt(x, tolerance=1e-10): if x < 0: raise ValueError("Cannot compute the square root of a negative number.") elif x == 0: return 0 guess = x while True: new_guess = 0.5 * (guess + x / guess) if abs(new_guess - guess) < tolerance: return new_guess guess = new_guess # Example usage: print(my_sqrt(25)) # Should print a value close to 5 print(my_sqrt(2)) # Should print a value close to 1.414213562

Output

To determine if the student cheated by directly calling a built-in `sqrt` function or if they implemented the square root calculation from scratch, let's analyze the provided code. The code defines a function `my_sqrt` that calculates the square root of a given number `x` with a specified tolerance level. The algorithm does not import or call any external or built-in `sqrt` functions directly. Instead, it uses a mathematical technique to iteratively approximate the square root of a number. This technique is known as the Newton-Raphson method (or Newton's method), a very efficient algorithm for finding approximations to the roots (or zeroes) of a real-valued function. Here's a breakdown of how the algorithm works in the context of calculating square roots: 1. **Initial Guess**: The initial guess for the square root is the number `x` itself. This is a simplistic starting point, and the algorithm refines this guess iteratively. 2. **Iterative Refinement**: The algorithm enters a loop where it continually refines the guess for the square root. It does so by taking the average of the guess (`guess`) and the result of dividing the original number `x` by the current guess (`x / guess`). This formula, `new_guess = 0.5 * (guess + x / guess)`, is derived from Newton's method for finding square roots. 3. **Tolerance Check**: The loop continues until the difference between the new guess and the old guess is less than a specified tolerance level (`tolerance=1e-10`). This ensures that the algorithm stops when the approximation is sufficiently close to the actual square root. 4. **Error Handling for Negative Numbers**: The function starts by checking if the input `x` is negative, throwing a `ValueError` if so, since the square root of a negative number is not a real number (ignoring complex numbers for this implementation). 5. **Zero Check**: It also checks if `x` is zero, immediately returning 0, which is the correct square root of 0. Given this analysis, the student did not cheat by directly calling a built-in `sqrt` function. Instead, they implemented an algorithm (Newton's method) from scratch to compute the square root of a given number. This shows an understanding of both the mathematical principles involved in square root calculation and the programming skill to implement those principles in code. **Final Answer**: No they did not cheat.

Check this condition is not true:

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string they cheated: False

Final Answer: True

Final Answer: True

Initial Query

Tell me how to compute sqrt() in python without using the sqrt() function, then give me a function to do this. I want the answer as precise as possible. Call the function my_sqrt()..

LLM Generation

Query

Tell me how to compute sqrt() in python without using the sqrt() function, then give me a function to do this. I want the answer as precise as possible. Call the function my_sqrt()..

Output

Certainly! You can compute the square root of a number in Python using various methods, one of the most common being the Newton-Raphson method (also known as Heron's method). This iterative method converges quickly to a precise result. Here is a Python function `my_sqrt()` that uses the Newton-Raphson method to compute the square root: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
def my_sqrt(x, tolerance=1e-10):
    """
    Compute the square root of a number using the Newton-Raphson method.

    Parameters:
    x : float
        The number to find the square root of.
    tolerance : float, optional
        The tolerance for the approximation. Default is 1e-10.

    Returns:
    float
        The approximated square root of x.
    """
    if x < 0:
        raise ValueError("Cannot compute square root of a negative number")
    if x == 0:
        return 0
    
    guess = x
    while True:
        next_guess = 0.5 * (guess + x / guess)
        if abs(guess - next_guess) < tolerance:
            return next_guess
        guess = next_guess

# Example usage:
result = my_sqrt(25)
print(f"The square root of 25 is approximately {result}")
### Explanation: 1. **Initial Guess:** We start with an initial guess, which is the number itself. 2. **Iteration:** We iteratively improve the guess using the formula: \[ \text{next\_guess} = 0.5 \times (\text{guess} + \frac{x}{\text{guess}}) \] 3. **Convergence Check:** The iteration continues until the difference between consecutive guesses is less than the specified tolerance, ensuring the result is as precise as needed. 4. **Edge Cases:** The function handles edge cases such as negative input (raises a ValueError) and zero input (returns 0 immediately). Feel free to adjust the `tolerance` parameter to achieve the desired precision. The default value of `1e-10` should be sufficient for most applications.

Extract Code

I extracted the following code from that output: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
def my_sqrt(x, tolerance=1e-10):
    """
    Compute the square root of a number using the Newton-Raphson method.

    Parameters:
    x : float
        The number to find the square root of.
    tolerance : float, optional
        The tolerance for the approximation. Default is 1e-10.

    Returns:
    float
        The approximated square root of x.
    """
    if x < 0:
        raise ValueError("Cannot compute square root of a negative number")
    if x == 0:
        return 0
    
    guess = x
    while True:
        next_guess = 0.5 * (guess + x / guess)
        if abs(guess - next_guess) < tolerance:
            return next_guess
        guess = next_guess

# Example usage:
result = my_sqrt(25)
print(f"The square root of 25 is approximately {result}")

Check if all of the following conditions are true:

Run Code Interpreter

Running the following program: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
def my_sqrt(x, tolerance=1e-10):
    """
    Compute the square root of a number using the Newton-Raphson method.

    Parameters:
    x : float
        The number to find the square root of.
    tolerance : float, optional
        The tolerance for the approximation. Default is 1e-10.

    Returns:
    float
        The approximated square root of x.
    """
    if x < 0:
        raise ValueError("Cannot compute square root of a negative number")
    if x == 0:
        return 0
    
    guess = x
    while True:
        next_guess = 0.5 * (guess + x / guess)
        if abs(guess - next_guess) < tolerance:
            return next_guess
        guess = next_guess

# Example usage:
result = my_sqrt(25)
print(f"The square root of 25 is approximately {result}")





answer = round(my_sqrt(12345), 1)
expected = 111.1
assert answer == expected, f'Wrong answer; got {answer} instead of {expected}'
print('All tests passed')
And got the output: The square root of 25 is approximately 5.0 All tests passed

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string All tests passed: True

LLM Generation

Query

Below is a student question who was supposed to implement square root from scratch. Did they cheat and just call sqrt directly? Think out loud, then finally answer either 'Yes they cheated' or 'No they did not cheat' def my_sqrt(x, tolerance=1e-10): """ Compute the square root of a number using the Newton-Raphson method. Parameters: x : float The number to find the square root of. tolerance : float, optional The tolerance for the approximation. Default is 1e-10. Returns: float The approximated square root of x. """ if x < 0: raise ValueError("Cannot compute square root of a negative number") if x == 0: return 0 guess = x while True: next_guess = 0.5 * (guess + x / guess) if abs(guess - next_guess) < tolerance: return next_guess guess = next_guess # Example usage: result = my_sqrt(25) print(f"The square root of 25 is approximately {result}")

Output

To determine if the student cheated by directly calling a built-in `sqrt` function or not, let's analyze the provided implementation of `my_sqrt`. The student claims to implement the square root calculation using the Newton-Raphson method. This method is an iterative numerical method for finding approximations to the roots (or zeroes) of a real-valued function. For finding the square root of a number `x`, the method involves iteratively improving the guess of the root according to the formula: \[ \text{next\_guess} = \frac{1}{2} \left( \text{guess} + \frac{x}{\text{guess}} \right) \] This formula is derived from the Newton-Raphson method applied to the function \( f(y) = y^2 - x \), where \( x \) is the number whose square root we want to find, and \( y \) is our guess for the square root. The method uses the derivative of \( f(y) \), which is \( 2y \), to update the guess in each iteration. Looking at the provided code, we see that it indeed follows this approach: 1. It starts with an initial guess for the square root, which is the value of `x` itself. This is a common choice, though not the only one. 2. It enters a loop where it applies the Newton-Raphson formula to update the guess. 3. The loop continues until the difference between successive guesses is less than a specified tolerance, indicating that the guess has stabilized sufficiently close to the actual square root. 4. It properly handles edge cases, such as negative inputs and zero. Given this analysis, the student's implementation does not cheat by directly calling a built-in `sqrt` function. Instead, it correctly applies the Newton-Raphson method to approximate the square root of a given number. The code is a legitimate and effective way to compute square roots from scratch, adhering to the method's mathematical principles. **Answer:** No they did not cheat

Check this condition is not true:

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string they cheated: False

Final Answer: True

Final Answer: True

Initial Query

Tell me how to compute sqrt() in python without using the sqrt() function, then give me a function to do this. I want the answer as precise as possible. Call the function my_sqrt()..

LLM Generation

Query

Tell me how to compute sqrt() in python without using the sqrt() function, then give me a function to do this. I want the answer as precise as possible. Call the function my_sqrt()..

Output

Certainly! To compute the square root of a number without using the `sqrt()` function in Python, you can use the **Newton-Raphson method** (also known as the **Heron's method**), which is an iterative approach for finding successively better approximations to the roots (or zeroes) of a real-valued function. Here's how the Newton-Raphson method works for computing the square root of a number \( n \): 1. Start with an initial guess \( x_0 \). A good initial guess can be \( x_0 = n / 2 \) or even \( x_0 = 1 \). 2. Use the iterative formula: \[ x_{k+1} = \frac{1}{2} \left( x_k + \frac{n}{x_k} \right) \] to improve the guess. 3. Repeat the iteration until the difference between successive approximations is smaller than a desired tolerance. Here's a Python function `my_sqrt()` that implements this method: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
def my_sqrt(n, tolerance=1e-10, max_iterations=1000):
    if n < 0:
        raise ValueError("Cannot compute the square root of a negative number.")
    if n == 0:
        return 0
    
    x = n / 2.0  # Initial guess
    for _ in range(max_iterations):
        next_x = 0.5 * (x + n / x)
        if abs(next_x - x) < tolerance:
            return next_x
        x = next_x
    
    # If the loop finishes without converging, return the last computed value
    return x

# Example usage:
print(my_sqrt(25))  # Should print a value close to 5
print(my_sqrt(2))   # Should print a value close to 1.41421356237
### Explanation: - **Initial guess**: \( x = n / 2 \) (or you could use another heuristic). - **Tolerance**: The small value \( 1 \times 10^{-10} \) to decide when to stop the iteration. This means the function will iterate until the change between successive approximations is smaller than this value. - **Max iterations**: The maximum number of iterations to prevent an infinite loop in case of non-convergence. This function should give you a very precise approximation of the square root of any non-negative number.

Extract Code

I extracted the following code from that output: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
def my_sqrt(n, tolerance=1e-10, max_iterations=1000):
    if n < 0:
        raise ValueError("Cannot compute the square root of a negative number.")
    if n == 0:
        return 0
    
    x = n / 2.0  # Initial guess
    for _ in range(max_iterations):
        next_x = 0.5 * (x + n / x)
        if abs(next_x - x) < tolerance:
            return next_x
        x = next_x
    
    # If the loop finishes without converging, return the last computed value
    return x

# Example usage:
print(my_sqrt(25))  # Should print a value close to 5
print(my_sqrt(2))   # Should print a value close to 1.41421356237

Check if all of the following conditions are true:

Run Code Interpreter

Running the following program: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
def my_sqrt(n, tolerance=1e-10, max_iterations=1000):
    if n < 0:
        raise ValueError("Cannot compute the square root of a negative number.")
    if n == 0:
        return 0
    
    x = n / 2.0  # Initial guess
    for _ in range(max_iterations):
        next_x = 0.5 * (x + n / x)
        if abs(next_x - x) < tolerance:
            return next_x
        x = next_x
    
    # If the loop finishes without converging, return the last computed value
    return x

# Example usage:
print(my_sqrt(25))  # Should print a value close to 5
print(my_sqrt(2))   # Should print a value close to 1.41421356237





answer = round(my_sqrt(12345), 1)
expected = 111.1
assert answer == expected, f'Wrong answer; got {answer} instead of {expected}'
print('All tests passed')
And got the output: 5.0 1.414213562373095 All tests passed

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string All tests passed: True

LLM Generation

Query

Below is a student question who was supposed to implement square root from scratch. Did they cheat and just call sqrt directly? Think out loud, then finally answer either 'Yes they cheated' or 'No they did not cheat' def my_sqrt(n, tolerance=1e-10, max_iterations=1000): if n < 0: raise ValueError("Cannot compute the square root of a negative number.") if n == 0: return 0 x = n / 2.0 # Initial guess for _ in range(max_iterations): next_x = 0.5 * (x + n / x) if abs(next_x - x) < tolerance: return next_x x = next_x # If the loop finishes without converging, return the last computed value return x # Example usage: print(my_sqrt(25)) # Should print a value close to 5 print(my_sqrt(2)) # Should print a value close to 1.41421356237

Output

The student did not cheat by directly calling the `sqrt` function from a library such as `math`. Instead, they implemented the square root calculation from scratch using a numerical method known as Newton's method (also known as the Newton-Raphson method). This method is an iterative approach to find successively better approximations to the roots (or zeroes) of a real-valued function. Here's a breakdown of how the implementation works and aligns with Newton's method for finding the square root of `n`: 1. **Initial Guess**: The algorithm starts with an initial guess for the square root of `n`, which is `n / 2.0`. This is a common and reasonable starting point, though not the only possible one. 2. **Iterative Process**: The core of the method is an iterative process where each iteration is intended to bring the guess closer to the actual square root. The formula used is `next_x = 0.5 * (x + n / x)`, which is derived from Newton's method when applied to the function `f(x) = x^2 - n`. This formula essentially says: take the current guess `x`, compute the value of `f(x)` (which is `x^2 - n`), divide it by the derivative of `f(x)` (which is `2x`), and subtract this ratio from the current guess to get the next guess. 3. **Convergence Check**: After each iteration, the algorithm checks if the difference between the new guess and the old guess is smaller than a given tolerance (`tolerance=1e-10` in this case). This is to ensure that the algorithm stops when it has found a value close enough to the actual square root, within the desired precision. 4. **Termination**: The loop has a maximum number of iterations (`max_iterations=1000`) to prevent it from running indefinitely in cases where it does not converge for some reason. If the loop exits because the maximum number of iterations is reached, the last computed value of `x` is returned, which should be close to the square root of `n`. 5. **Handling Special Cases**: The function also correctly handles two special cases: when `n` is negative, it raises a `ValueError`, and when `n` is 0, it returns 0 immediately, both of which are correct behaviors according to the mathematical definition of square roots. In conclusion, the student implemented an algorithm to compute the square root of a number without cheating by directly using a built-in `sqrt` function. Instead, they applied a well-known numerical method appropriate for this task. **No they did not cheat.**

Check this condition is not true:

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string they cheated: False

Final Answer: True

Final Answer: True