Initial Query

Fix the bug in this jnp function. Write out the full correct version of the code. import jax import jax.numpy as jnp def init_mlp_params(input_size, hidden_size, output_size, key): k1, k2 = jax.random.split(key) # Initialize weights and biases for the first linear layer w1 = jax.random.normal(k1, (hidden_size, input_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / input_size) b1 = jnp.zeros(hidden_size) # Initialize weights and biases for the second linear layer w2 = jax.random.normal(k2, (output_size, hidden_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / hidden_size) b2 = jnp.zeros(output_size) return {'w1': w1, 'b1': b1, 'w2': w2, 'b2': b2} def mlp_apply(params, x): # First linear layer x = jnp.dot(x, params['w1'].T) + params['b1'] # Relu activation x = jax.nn.relu(x) # Second linear layer x = jnp.dot(x, params['w2'].T) + params['b2'] # Softmax activation return jax.nn.softmax(x, axis=1) # Example usage: key = jax.random.PRNGKey(0) params = init_mlp_params(10, 20, 30, key) x = jax.random.normal(key, (5, 10)) # random input similar to torch.randn y = mlp_apply(params, x) print(list(y.flatten().sum(1))) # The output sum should be very close to [1, 1, 1, 1, 1]

LLM Generation

Query

Fix the bug in this jnp function. Write out the full correct version of the code. import jax import jax.numpy as jnp def init_mlp_params(input_size, hidden_size, output_size, key): k1, k2 = jax.random.split(key) # Initialize weights and biases for the first linear layer w1 = jax.random.normal(k1, (hidden_size, input_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / input_size) b1 = jnp.zeros(hidden_size) # Initialize weights and biases for the second linear layer w2 = jax.random.normal(k2, (output_size, hidden_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / hidden_size) b2 = jnp.zeros(output_size) return {'w1': w1, 'b1': b1, 'w2': w2, 'b2': b2} def mlp_apply(params, x): # First linear layer x = jnp.dot(x, params['w1'].T) + params['b1'] # Relu activation x = jax.nn.relu(x) # Second linear layer x = jnp.dot(x, params['w2'].T) + params['b2'] # Softmax activation return jax.nn.softmax(x, axis=1) # Example usage: key = jax.random.PRNGKey(0) params = init_mlp_params(10, 20, 30, key) x = jax.random.normal(key, (5, 10)) # random input similar to torch.randn y = mlp_apply(params, x) print(list(y.flatten().sum(1))) # The output sum should be very close to [1, 1, 1, 1, 1]

Output

The bug is in the print statement and the softmax axis. Here's the corrected version of the code: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
import jax
import jax.numpy as jnp

def init_mlp_params(input_size, hidden_size, output_size, key):
    k1, k2 = jax.random.split(key)
    # Initialize weights and biases for the first linear layer
    w1 = jax.random.normal(k1, (hidden_size, input_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / input_size)
    b1 = jnp.zeros(hidden_size)
    # Initialize weights and biases for the second linear layer
    w2 = jax.random.normal(k2, (output_size, hidden_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / hidden_size)
    b2 = jnp.zeros(output_size)
    return {'w1': w1, 'b1': b1, 'w2': w2, 'b2': b2}

def mlp_apply(params, x):
    # First linear layer
    x = jnp.dot(x, params['w1'].T) + params['b1']
    # Relu activation
    x = jax.nn.relu(x)
    # Second linear layer
    x = jnp.dot(x, params['w2'].T) + params['b2']
    # Softmax activation
    return jax.nn.softmax(x, axis=-1)  # Changed axis to -1

# Example usage:
key = jax.random.PRNGKey(0)
params = init_mlp_params(10, 20, 30, key)
x = jax.random.normal(key, (5, 10))  # random input similar to torch.randn
y = mlp_apply(params, x)
print(y.sum(axis=1))  # Corrected sum operation
The main fixes are: 1. Changed the softmax axis from `axis=1` to `axis=-1` in the `mlp_apply` function. This ensures the softmax is applied along the last dimension (feature dimension). 2. Fixed the print statement to correctly sum along axis 1 using `y.sum(axis=1)` instead of the incorrect `list(y.flatten().sum(1))`. With these corrections, the code will: - Properly initialize an MLP with the specified dimensions - Apply the forward pass correctly - Output probabilities that sum to 1 for each sample in the batch The output will show 5 values (one for each input sample) that should each be very close to 1.0, as expected for properly normalized probability distributions from softmax.

Extract Code

I extracted the following code from that output: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
import jax
import jax.numpy as jnp

def init_mlp_params(input_size, hidden_size, output_size, key):
    k1, k2 = jax.random.split(key)
    # Initialize weights and biases for the first linear layer
    w1 = jax.random.normal(k1, (hidden_size, input_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / input_size)
    b1 = jnp.zeros(hidden_size)
    # Initialize weights and biases for the second linear layer
    w2 = jax.random.normal(k2, (output_size, hidden_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / hidden_size)
    b2 = jnp.zeros(output_size)
    return {'w1': w1, 'b1': b1, 'w2': w2, 'b2': b2}

def mlp_apply(params, x):
    # First linear layer
    x = jnp.dot(x, params['w1'].T) + params['b1']
    # Relu activation
    x = jax.nn.relu(x)
    # Second linear layer
    x = jnp.dot(x, params['w2'].T) + params['b2']
    # Softmax activation
    return jax.nn.softmax(x, axis=-1)  # Changed axis to -1

# Example usage:
key = jax.random.PRNGKey(0)
params = init_mlp_params(10, 20, 30, key)
x = jax.random.normal(key, (5, 10))  # random input similar to torch.randn
y = mlp_apply(params, x)
print(y.sum(axis=1))  # Corrected sum operation

Run Code Interpreter

Running the following program: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
import jax
import jax.numpy as jnp

def init_mlp_params(input_size, hidden_size, output_size, key):
    k1, k2 = jax.random.split(key)
    # Initialize weights and biases for the first linear layer
    w1 = jax.random.normal(k1, (hidden_size, input_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / input_size)
    b1 = jnp.zeros(hidden_size)
    # Initialize weights and biases for the second linear layer
    w2 = jax.random.normal(k2, (output_size, hidden_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / hidden_size)
    b2 = jnp.zeros(output_size)
    return {'w1': w1, 'b1': b1, 'w2': w2, 'b2': b2}

def mlp_apply(params, x):
    # First linear layer
    x = jnp.dot(x, params['w1'].T) + params['b1']
    # Relu activation
    x = jax.nn.relu(x)
    # Second linear layer
    x = jnp.dot(x, params['w2'].T) + params['b2']
    # Softmax activation
    return jax.nn.softmax(x, axis=-1)  # Changed axis to -1

# Example usage:
key = jax.random.PRNGKey(0)
params = init_mlp_params(10, 20, 30, key)
x = jax.random.normal(key, (5, 10))  # random input similar to torch.randn
y = mlp_apply(params, x)
print(y.sum(axis=1))  # Corrected sum operation
And got the output: [1. 1. 0.9999999 1. 0.9999999]

Check if any of the following conditions are true:

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string 0.99999: True

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string 1.0: False

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string 1.00000: False

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string 1.0,: False

Final Answer: True

Initial Query

Fix the bug in this jnp function. Write out the full correct version of the code. import jax import jax.numpy as jnp def init_mlp_params(input_size, hidden_size, output_size, key): k1, k2 = jax.random.split(key) # Initialize weights and biases for the first linear layer w1 = jax.random.normal(k1, (hidden_size, input_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / input_size) b1 = jnp.zeros(hidden_size) # Initialize weights and biases for the second linear layer w2 = jax.random.normal(k2, (output_size, hidden_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / hidden_size) b2 = jnp.zeros(output_size) return {'w1': w1, 'b1': b1, 'w2': w2, 'b2': b2} def mlp_apply(params, x): # First linear layer x = jnp.dot(x, params['w1'].T) + params['b1'] # Relu activation x = jax.nn.relu(x) # Second linear layer x = jnp.dot(x, params['w2'].T) + params['b2'] # Softmax activation return jax.nn.softmax(x, axis=1) # Example usage: key = jax.random.PRNGKey(0) params = init_mlp_params(10, 20, 30, key) x = jax.random.normal(key, (5, 10)) # random input similar to torch.randn y = mlp_apply(params, x) print(list(y.flatten().sum(1))) # The output sum should be very close to [1, 1, 1, 1, 1]

LLM Generation

Query

Fix the bug in this jnp function. Write out the full correct version of the code. import jax import jax.numpy as jnp def init_mlp_params(input_size, hidden_size, output_size, key): k1, k2 = jax.random.split(key) # Initialize weights and biases for the first linear layer w1 = jax.random.normal(k1, (hidden_size, input_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / input_size) b1 = jnp.zeros(hidden_size) # Initialize weights and biases for the second linear layer w2 = jax.random.normal(k2, (output_size, hidden_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / hidden_size) b2 = jnp.zeros(output_size) return {'w1': w1, 'b1': b1, 'w2': w2, 'b2': b2} def mlp_apply(params, x): # First linear layer x = jnp.dot(x, params['w1'].T) + params['b1'] # Relu activation x = jax.nn.relu(x) # Second linear layer x = jnp.dot(x, params['w2'].T) + params['b2'] # Softmax activation return jax.nn.softmax(x, axis=1) # Example usage: key = jax.random.PRNGKey(0) params = init_mlp_params(10, 20, 30, key) x = jax.random.normal(key, (5, 10)) # random input similar to torch.randn y = mlp_apply(params, x) print(list(y.flatten().sum(1))) # The output sum should be very close to [1, 1, 1, 1, 1]

Output

The main bug in the code is in the axis specification for the softmax and the attempt to sum across an incorrect dimension in the print statement. Here's the corrected version: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
import jax
import jax.numpy as jnp

def init_mlp_params(input_size, hidden_size, output_size, key):
    k1, k2 = jax.random.split(key)
    # Initialize weights and biases for the first linear layer
    w1 = jax.random.normal(k1, (hidden_size, input_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / input_size)
    b1 = jnp.zeros(hidden_size)
    # Initialize weights and biases for the second linear layer
    w2 = jax.random.normal(k2, (output_size, hidden_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / hidden_size)
    b2 = jnp.zeros(output_size)
    return {'w1': w1, 'b1': b1, 'w2': w2, 'b2': b2}

def mlp_apply(params, x):
    # First linear layer
    x = jnp.dot(x, params['w1'].T) + params['b1']
    # Relu activation
    x = jax.nn.relu(x)
    # Second linear layer
    x = jnp.dot(x, params['w2'].T) + params['b2']
    # Softmax activation
    return jax.nn.softmax(x, axis=-1)  # Changed axis to -1

# Example usage:
key = jax.random.PRNGKey(0)
params = init_mlp_params(10, 20, 30, key)
x = jax.random.normal(key, (5, 10))  # random input similar to torch.randn
y = mlp_apply(params, x)
print(jnp.sum(y, axis=1))  # Correctly sum along the probability axis
The main changes made are: 1. Changed the softmax axis from `axis=1` to `axis=-1` in the `mlp_apply` function. This ensures the softmax is applied along the last dimension (feature dimension) for each sample in the batch. 2. Fixed the print statement to correctly sum along axis 1 (the probability distribution axis). The previous attempt to use `flatten()` and `sum(1)` was incorrect. The output will now show that each row sums to 1, which is expected for probability distributions produced by softmax. Each row represents one sample's probability distribution over the 30 output classes. When you run this code, you should see that each element in the printed array is very close to 1.0, confirming that the softmax operation is working correctly by producing valid probability distributions.

Extract Code

I extracted the following code from that output: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
import jax
import jax.numpy as jnp

def init_mlp_params(input_size, hidden_size, output_size, key):
    k1, k2 = jax.random.split(key)
    # Initialize weights and biases for the first linear layer
    w1 = jax.random.normal(k1, (hidden_size, input_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / input_size)
    b1 = jnp.zeros(hidden_size)
    # Initialize weights and biases for the second linear layer
    w2 = jax.random.normal(k2, (output_size, hidden_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / hidden_size)
    b2 = jnp.zeros(output_size)
    return {'w1': w1, 'b1': b1, 'w2': w2, 'b2': b2}

def mlp_apply(params, x):
    # First linear layer
    x = jnp.dot(x, params['w1'].T) + params['b1']
    # Relu activation
    x = jax.nn.relu(x)
    # Second linear layer
    x = jnp.dot(x, params['w2'].T) + params['b2']
    # Softmax activation
    return jax.nn.softmax(x, axis=-1)  # Changed axis to -1

# Example usage:
key = jax.random.PRNGKey(0)
params = init_mlp_params(10, 20, 30, key)
x = jax.random.normal(key, (5, 10))  # random input similar to torch.randn
y = mlp_apply(params, x)
print(jnp.sum(y, axis=1))  # Correctly sum along the probability axis

Run Code Interpreter

Running the following program: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
import jax
import jax.numpy as jnp

def init_mlp_params(input_size, hidden_size, output_size, key):
    k1, k2 = jax.random.split(key)
    # Initialize weights and biases for the first linear layer
    w1 = jax.random.normal(k1, (hidden_size, input_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / input_size)
    b1 = jnp.zeros(hidden_size)
    # Initialize weights and biases for the second linear layer
    w2 = jax.random.normal(k2, (output_size, hidden_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / hidden_size)
    b2 = jnp.zeros(output_size)
    return {'w1': w1, 'b1': b1, 'w2': w2, 'b2': b2}

def mlp_apply(params, x):
    # First linear layer
    x = jnp.dot(x, params['w1'].T) + params['b1']
    # Relu activation
    x = jax.nn.relu(x)
    # Second linear layer
    x = jnp.dot(x, params['w2'].T) + params['b2']
    # Softmax activation
    return jax.nn.softmax(x, axis=-1)  # Changed axis to -1

# Example usage:
key = jax.random.PRNGKey(0)
params = init_mlp_params(10, 20, 30, key)
x = jax.random.normal(key, (5, 10))  # random input similar to torch.randn
y = mlp_apply(params, x)
print(jnp.sum(y, axis=1))  # Correctly sum along the probability axis
And got the output: [1. 1. 0.9999999 1. 0.9999999]

Check if any of the following conditions are true:

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string 0.99999: True

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string 1.0: False

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string 1.00000: False

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string 1.0,: False

Final Answer: True

Initial Query

Fix the bug in this jnp function. Write out the full correct version of the code. import jax import jax.numpy as jnp def init_mlp_params(input_size, hidden_size, output_size, key): k1, k2 = jax.random.split(key) # Initialize weights and biases for the first linear layer w1 = jax.random.normal(k1, (hidden_size, input_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / input_size) b1 = jnp.zeros(hidden_size) # Initialize weights and biases for the second linear layer w2 = jax.random.normal(k2, (output_size, hidden_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / hidden_size) b2 = jnp.zeros(output_size) return {'w1': w1, 'b1': b1, 'w2': w2, 'b2': b2} def mlp_apply(params, x): # First linear layer x = jnp.dot(x, params['w1'].T) + params['b1'] # Relu activation x = jax.nn.relu(x) # Second linear layer x = jnp.dot(x, params['w2'].T) + params['b2'] # Softmax activation return jax.nn.softmax(x, axis=1) # Example usage: key = jax.random.PRNGKey(0) params = init_mlp_params(10, 20, 30, key) x = jax.random.normal(key, (5, 10)) # random input similar to torch.randn y = mlp_apply(params, x) print(list(y.flatten().sum(1))) # The output sum should be very close to [1, 1, 1, 1, 1]

LLM Generation

Query

Fix the bug in this jnp function. Write out the full correct version of the code. import jax import jax.numpy as jnp def init_mlp_params(input_size, hidden_size, output_size, key): k1, k2 = jax.random.split(key) # Initialize weights and biases for the first linear layer w1 = jax.random.normal(k1, (hidden_size, input_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / input_size) b1 = jnp.zeros(hidden_size) # Initialize weights and biases for the second linear layer w2 = jax.random.normal(k2, (output_size, hidden_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / hidden_size) b2 = jnp.zeros(output_size) return {'w1': w1, 'b1': b1, 'w2': w2, 'b2': b2} def mlp_apply(params, x): # First linear layer x = jnp.dot(x, params['w1'].T) + params['b1'] # Relu activation x = jax.nn.relu(x) # Second linear layer x = jnp.dot(x, params['w2'].T) + params['b2'] # Softmax activation return jax.nn.softmax(x, axis=1) # Example usage: key = jax.random.PRNGKey(0) params = init_mlp_params(10, 20, 30, key) x = jax.random.normal(key, (5, 10)) # random input similar to torch.randn y = mlp_apply(params, x) print(list(y.flatten().sum(1))) # The output sum should be very close to [1, 1, 1, 1, 1]

Output

The main issue in the code is with the softmax axis and the final print statement. Here's the corrected version: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
import jax
import jax.numpy as jnp

def init_mlp_params(input_size, hidden_size, output_size, key):
    k1, k2 = jax.random.split(key)
    # Initialize weights and biases for the first linear layer
    w1 = jax.random.normal(k1, (hidden_size, input_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / input_size)
    b1 = jnp.zeros(hidden_size)
    # Initialize weights and biases for the second linear layer
    w2 = jax.random.normal(k2, (output_size, hidden_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / hidden_size)
    b2 = jnp.zeros(output_size)
    return {'w1': w1, 'b1': b1, 'w2': w2, 'b2': b2}

def mlp_apply(params, x):
    # First linear layer
    x = jnp.dot(x, params['w1'].T) + params['b1']
    # Relu activation
    x = jax.nn.relu(x)
    # Second linear layer
    x = jnp.dot(x, params['w2'].T) + params['b2']
    # Softmax activation
    return jax.nn.softmax(x, axis=-1)  # Changed axis to -1

# Example usage:
key = jax.random.PRNGKey(0)
params = init_mlp_params(10, 20, 30, key)
x = jax.random.normal(key, (5, 10))  # random input similar to torch.randn
y = mlp_apply(params, x)
print(jnp.sum(y, axis=1))  # The output sum should be very close to [1, 1, 1, 1, 1]
The main changes made are: 1. Changed the softmax axis from `axis=1` to `axis=-1` in the `mlp_apply` function. This ensures the softmax is applied along the last dimension (feature dimension). 2. Fixed the final print statement. The original code tried to flatten and use `sum(1)` which doesn't work correctly. Instead, we now use `jnp.sum(y, axis=1)` to sum along the correct dimension. When you run this code, you should get an output array of shape (5,) with values very close to 1 for each element, confirming that the softmax operation is working correctly. The output should look something like: 
1
[1. 1. 1. 1. 1.]
This implementation now correctly: - Initializes the MLP parameters - Applies the forward pass through the network - Applies softmax correctly along the feature dimension - Produces proper probability distributions (sums to 1 for each input)

Extract Code

I extracted the following code from that output: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
import jax
import jax.numpy as jnp

def init_mlp_params(input_size, hidden_size, output_size, key):
    k1, k2 = jax.random.split(key)
    # Initialize weights and biases for the first linear layer
    w1 = jax.random.normal(k1, (hidden_size, input_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / input_size)
    b1 = jnp.zeros(hidden_size)
    # Initialize weights and biases for the second linear layer
    w2 = jax.random.normal(k2, (output_size, hidden_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / hidden_size)
    b2 = jnp.zeros(output_size)
    return {'w1': w1, 'b1': b1, 'w2': w2, 'b2': b2}

def mlp_apply(params, x):
    # First linear layer
    x = jnp.dot(x, params['w1'].T) + params['b1']
    # Relu activation
    x = jax.nn.relu(x)
    # Second linear layer
    x = jnp.dot(x, params['w2'].T) + params['b2']
    # Softmax activation
    return jax.nn.softmax(x, axis=-1)  # Changed axis to -1

def main():
    key = jax.random.PRNGKey(0)
    params = init_mlp_params(10, 20, 30, key)
    x = jax.random.normal(key, (5, 10))  # random input similar to torch.randn
    y = mlp_apply(params, x)
    print(jnp.sum(y, axis=1))  # The output sum should be very close to [1, 1, 1, 1, 1]

if __name__ == "__main__":
    main()

Run Code Interpreter

Running the following program: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
import jax
import jax.numpy as jnp

def init_mlp_params(input_size, hidden_size, output_size, key):
    k1, k2 = jax.random.split(key)
    # Initialize weights and biases for the first linear layer
    w1 = jax.random.normal(k1, (hidden_size, input_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / input_size)
    b1 = jnp.zeros(hidden_size)
    # Initialize weights and biases for the second linear layer
    w2 = jax.random.normal(k2, (output_size, hidden_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / hidden_size)
    b2 = jnp.zeros(output_size)
    return {'w1': w1, 'b1': b1, 'w2': w2, 'b2': b2}

def mlp_apply(params, x):
    # First linear layer
    x = jnp.dot(x, params['w1'].T) + params['b1']
    # Relu activation
    x = jax.nn.relu(x)
    # Second linear layer
    x = jnp.dot(x, params['w2'].T) + params['b2']
    # Softmax activation
    return jax.nn.softmax(x, axis=-1)  # Changed axis to -1

def main():
    key = jax.random.PRNGKey(0)
    params = init_mlp_params(10, 20, 30, key)
    x = jax.random.normal(key, (5, 10))  # random input similar to torch.randn
    y = mlp_apply(params, x)
    print(jnp.sum(y, axis=1))  # The output sum should be very close to [1, 1, 1, 1, 1]

if __name__ == "__main__":
    main()
And got the output: [1. 1. 0.9999999 1. 0.9999999]

Check if any of the following conditions are true:

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string 0.99999: True

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string 1.0: False

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string 1.00000: False

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string 1.0,: False

Final Answer: True

Initial Query

Fix the bug in this jnp function. Write out the full correct version of the code. import jax import jax.numpy as jnp def init_mlp_params(input_size, hidden_size, output_size, key): k1, k2 = jax.random.split(key) # Initialize weights and biases for the first linear layer w1 = jax.random.normal(k1, (hidden_size, input_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / input_size) b1 = jnp.zeros(hidden_size) # Initialize weights and biases for the second linear layer w2 = jax.random.normal(k2, (output_size, hidden_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / hidden_size) b2 = jnp.zeros(output_size) return {'w1': w1, 'b1': b1, 'w2': w2, 'b2': b2} def mlp_apply(params, x): # First linear layer x = jnp.dot(x, params['w1'].T) + params['b1'] # Relu activation x = jax.nn.relu(x) # Second linear layer x = jnp.dot(x, params['w2'].T) + params['b2'] # Softmax activation return jax.nn.softmax(x, axis=1) # Example usage: key = jax.random.PRNGKey(0) params = init_mlp_params(10, 20, 30, key) x = jax.random.normal(key, (5, 10)) # random input similar to torch.randn y = mlp_apply(params, x) print(list(y.flatten().sum(1))) # The output sum should be very close to [1, 1, 1, 1, 1]

LLM Generation

Query

Fix the bug in this jnp function. Write out the full correct version of the code. import jax import jax.numpy as jnp def init_mlp_params(input_size, hidden_size, output_size, key): k1, k2 = jax.random.split(key) # Initialize weights and biases for the first linear layer w1 = jax.random.normal(k1, (hidden_size, input_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / input_size) b1 = jnp.zeros(hidden_size) # Initialize weights and biases for the second linear layer w2 = jax.random.normal(k2, (output_size, hidden_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / hidden_size) b2 = jnp.zeros(output_size) return {'w1': w1, 'b1': b1, 'w2': w2, 'b2': b2} def mlp_apply(params, x): # First linear layer x = jnp.dot(x, params['w1'].T) + params['b1'] # Relu activation x = jax.nn.relu(x) # Second linear layer x = jnp.dot(x, params['w2'].T) + params['b2'] # Softmax activation return jax.nn.softmax(x, axis=1) # Example usage: key = jax.random.PRNGKey(0) params = init_mlp_params(10, 20, 30, key) x = jax.random.normal(key, (5, 10)) # random input similar to torch.randn y = mlp_apply(params, x) print(list(y.flatten().sum(1))) # The output sum should be very close to [1, 1, 1, 1, 1]

Output

The main issue in the code is with the softmax axis and the final print statement. Here's the corrected version: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
import jax
import jax.numpy as jnp

def init_mlp_params(input_size, hidden_size, output_size, key):
    k1, k2 = jax.random.split(key)
    # Initialize weights and biases for the first linear layer
    w1 = jax.random.normal(k1, (hidden_size, input_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / input_size)
    b1 = jnp.zeros(hidden_size)
    # Initialize weights and biases for the second linear layer
    w2 = jax.random.normal(k2, (output_size, hidden_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / hidden_size)
    b2 = jnp.zeros(output_size)
    return {'w1': w1, 'b1': b1, 'w2': w2, 'b2': b2}

def mlp_apply(params, x):
    # First linear layer
    x = jnp.dot(x, params['w1'].T) + params['b1']
    # Relu activation
    x = jax.nn.relu(x)
    # Second linear layer
    x = jnp.dot(x, params['w2'].T) + params['b2']
    # Softmax activation
    return jax.nn.softmax(x, axis=-1)  # Changed axis to -1

# Example usage:
key = jax.random.PRNGKey(0)
params = init_mlp_params(10, 20, 30, key)
x = jax.random.normal(key, (5, 10))  # random input similar to torch.randn
y = mlp_apply(params, x)
print(jnp.sum(y, axis=1))  # Correctly sum along the probability distribution axis
The main changes made are: 1. Changed the softmax axis from `axis=1` to `axis=-1` in the `mlp_apply` function. This ensures the softmax is applied across the output features (last dimension) for each example in the batch. 2. Fixed the final print statement to correctly sum along axis 1 (the probability distribution axis). The previous version had incorrect syntax trying to flatten and sum. Now the output will show 5 values (one for each input example) that should each sum to approximately 1.0, as expected for probability distributions produced by softmax. When you run this code, you should see output like: 
1
[1. 1. 1. 1. 1.]
or values very close to 1 (within floating-point precision).

Extract Code

I extracted the following code from that output: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
import jax
import jax.numpy as jnp

def init_mlp_params(input_size, hidden_size, output_size, key):
    k1, k2 = jax.random.split(key)
    # Initialize weights and biases for the first linear layer
    w1 = jax.random.normal(k1, (hidden_size, input_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / input_size)
    b1 = jnp.zeros(hidden_size)
    # Initialize weights and biases for the second linear layer
    w2 = jax.random.normal(k2, (output_size, hidden_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / hidden_size)
    b2 = jnp.zeros(output_size)
    return {'w1': w1, 'b1': b1, 'w2': w2, 'b2': b2}

def mlp_apply(params, x):
    # First linear layer
    x = jnp.dot(x, params['w1'].T) + params['b1']
    # Relu activation
    x = jax.nn.relu(x)
    # Second linear layer
    x = jnp.dot(x, params['w2'].T) + params['b2']
    # Softmax activation
    return jax.nn.softmax(x, axis=-1)

if __name__ == "__main__":
    key = jax.random.PRNGKey(0)
    params = init_mlp_params(10, 20, 30, key)
    x = jax.random.normal(key, (5, 10))
    y = mlp_apply(params, x)
    print(jnp.sum(y, axis=1))

Run Code Interpreter

Running the following program: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
import jax
import jax.numpy as jnp

def init_mlp_params(input_size, hidden_size, output_size, key):
    k1, k2 = jax.random.split(key)
    # Initialize weights and biases for the first linear layer
    w1 = jax.random.normal(k1, (hidden_size, input_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / input_size)
    b1 = jnp.zeros(hidden_size)
    # Initialize weights and biases for the second linear layer
    w2 = jax.random.normal(k2, (output_size, hidden_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / hidden_size)
    b2 = jnp.zeros(output_size)
    return {'w1': w1, 'b1': b1, 'w2': w2, 'b2': b2}

def mlp_apply(params, x):
    # First linear layer
    x = jnp.dot(x, params['w1'].T) + params['b1']
    # Relu activation
    x = jax.nn.relu(x)
    # Second linear layer
    x = jnp.dot(x, params['w2'].T) + params['b2']
    # Softmax activation
    return jax.nn.softmax(x, axis=-1)

if __name__ == "__main__":
    key = jax.random.PRNGKey(0)
    params = init_mlp_params(10, 20, 30, key)
    x = jax.random.normal(key, (5, 10))
    y = mlp_apply(params, x)
    print(jnp.sum(y, axis=1))
And got the output: [1. 1. 0.9999999 1. 0.9999999]

Check if any of the following conditions are true:

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string 0.99999: True

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string 1.0: False

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string 1.00000: False

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string 1.0,: False

Final Answer: True

Initial Query

Fix the bug in this jnp function. Write out the full correct version of the code. import jax import jax.numpy as jnp def init_mlp_params(input_size, hidden_size, output_size, key): k1, k2 = jax.random.split(key) # Initialize weights and biases for the first linear layer w1 = jax.random.normal(k1, (hidden_size, input_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / input_size) b1 = jnp.zeros(hidden_size) # Initialize weights and biases for the second linear layer w2 = jax.random.normal(k2, (output_size, hidden_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / hidden_size) b2 = jnp.zeros(output_size) return {'w1': w1, 'b1': b1, 'w2': w2, 'b2': b2} def mlp_apply(params, x): # First linear layer x = jnp.dot(x, params['w1'].T) + params['b1'] # Relu activation x = jax.nn.relu(x) # Second linear layer x = jnp.dot(x, params['w2'].T) + params['b2'] # Softmax activation return jax.nn.softmax(x, axis=1) # Example usage: key = jax.random.PRNGKey(0) params = init_mlp_params(10, 20, 30, key) x = jax.random.normal(key, (5, 10)) # random input similar to torch.randn y = mlp_apply(params, x) print(list(y.flatten().sum(1))) # The output sum should be very close to [1, 1, 1, 1, 1]

LLM Generation

Query

Fix the bug in this jnp function. Write out the full correct version of the code. import jax import jax.numpy as jnp def init_mlp_params(input_size, hidden_size, output_size, key): k1, k2 = jax.random.split(key) # Initialize weights and biases for the first linear layer w1 = jax.random.normal(k1, (hidden_size, input_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / input_size) b1 = jnp.zeros(hidden_size) # Initialize weights and biases for the second linear layer w2 = jax.random.normal(k2, (output_size, hidden_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / hidden_size) b2 = jnp.zeros(output_size) return {'w1': w1, 'b1': b1, 'w2': w2, 'b2': b2} def mlp_apply(params, x): # First linear layer x = jnp.dot(x, params['w1'].T) + params['b1'] # Relu activation x = jax.nn.relu(x) # Second linear layer x = jnp.dot(x, params['w2'].T) + params['b2'] # Softmax activation return jax.nn.softmax(x, axis=1) # Example usage: key = jax.random.PRNGKey(0) params = init_mlp_params(10, 20, 30, key) x = jax.random.normal(key, (5, 10)) # random input similar to torch.randn y = mlp_apply(params, x) print(list(y.flatten().sum(1))) # The output sum should be very close to [1, 1, 1, 1, 1]

Output

The bug in the code is in the softmax operation's axis parameter and the final print statement. Here's the corrected version of the code: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
import jax
import jax.numpy as jnp

def init_mlp_params(input_size, hidden_size, output_size, key):
    k1, k2 = jax.random.split(key)
    # Initialize weights and biases for the first linear layer
    w1 = jax.random.normal(k1, (hidden_size, input_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / input_size)
    b1 = jnp.zeros(hidden_size)
    # Initialize weights and biases for the second linear layer
    w2 = jax.random.normal(k2, (output_size, hidden_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / hidden_size)
    b2 = jnp.zeros(output_size)
    return {'w1': w1, 'b1': b1, 'w2': w2, 'b2': b2}

def mlp_apply(params, x):
    # First linear layer
    x = jnp.dot(x, params['w1'].T) + params['b1']
    # Relu activation
    x = jax.nn.relu(x)
    # Second linear layer
    x = jnp.dot(x, params['w2'].T) + params['b2']
    # Softmax activation
    return jax.nn.softmax(x, axis=-1)  # Changed axis=1 to axis=-1

# Example usage:
key = jax.random.PRNGKey(0)
params = init_mlp_params(10, 20, 30, key)
x = jax.random.normal(key, (5, 10))  # random input similar to torch.randn
y = mlp_apply(params, x)
print(y.sum(axis=1))  # Corrected the sum operation
The main changes made are: 1. Changed `axis=1` to `axis=-1` in the softmax operation. This ensures the softmax is applied along the last dimension, which is the feature dimension. 2. Fixed the final print statement to correctly sum along axis=1 to verify that each sample's probabilities sum to 1. The output should now show 5 values that are very close to 1.0, confirming that the softmax operation is working correctly for each sample in the batch. Each value represents the sum of probabilities for one sample, which should equal 1 as softmax produces a valid probability distribution. This version of the code properly implements a multi-layer perceptron with: - Input size: 10 - Hidden size: 20 - Output size: 30 - ReLU activation after the first layer - Softmax activation after the second layer The network will process a batch of 5 samples, and the output for each sample will be a probability distribution over 30 classes.

Extract Code

I extracted the following code from that output: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
import jax
import jax.numpy as jnp

def init_mlp_params(input_size, hidden_size, output_size, key):
    k1, k2 = jax.random.split(key)
    # Initialize weights and biases for the first linear layer
    w1 = jax.random.normal(k1, (hidden_size, input_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / input_size)
    b1 = jnp.zeros(hidden_size)
    # Initialize weights and biases for the second linear layer
    w2 = jax.random.normal(k2, (output_size, hidden_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / hidden_size)
    b2 = jnp.zeros(output_size)
    return {'w1': w1, 'b1': b1, 'w2': w2, 'b2': b2}

def mlp_apply(params, x):
    # First linear layer
    x = jnp.dot(x, params['w1'].T) + params['b1']
    # Relu activation
    x = jax.nn.relu(x)
    # Second linear layer
    x = jnp.dot(x, params['w2'].T) + params['b2']
    # Softmax activation
    return jax.nn.softmax(x, axis=-1)  # Changed axis=1 to axis=-1

# Example usage:
key = jax.random.PRNGKey(0)
params = init_mlp_params(10, 20, 30, key)
x = jax.random.normal(key, (5, 10))  # random input similar to torch.randn
y = mlp_apply(params, x)
print(y.sum(axis=1))  # Corrected the sum operation

Run Code Interpreter

Running the following program: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
import jax
import jax.numpy as jnp

def init_mlp_params(input_size, hidden_size, output_size, key):
    k1, k2 = jax.random.split(key)
    # Initialize weights and biases for the first linear layer
    w1 = jax.random.normal(k1, (hidden_size, input_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / input_size)
    b1 = jnp.zeros(hidden_size)
    # Initialize weights and biases for the second linear layer
    w2 = jax.random.normal(k2, (output_size, hidden_size)) * jnp.sqrt(2.0 / hidden_size)
    b2 = jnp.zeros(output_size)
    return {'w1': w1, 'b1': b1, 'w2': w2, 'b2': b2}

def mlp_apply(params, x):
    # First linear layer
    x = jnp.dot(x, params['w1'].T) + params['b1']
    # Relu activation
    x = jax.nn.relu(x)
    # Second linear layer
    x = jnp.dot(x, params['w2'].T) + params['b2']
    # Softmax activation
    return jax.nn.softmax(x, axis=-1)  # Changed axis=1 to axis=-1

# Example usage:
key = jax.random.PRNGKey(0)
params = init_mlp_params(10, 20, 30, key)
x = jax.random.normal(key, (5, 10))  # random input similar to torch.randn
y = mlp_apply(params, x)
print(y.sum(axis=1))  # Corrected the sum operation
And got the output: [1. 1. 0.9999999 1. 0.9999999]

Check if any of the following conditions are true:

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string 0.99999: True

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string 1.0: False

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string 1.00000: False

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string 1.0,: False

Final Answer: True