Docker Setup

I have setup the docker container to run the model evaluation.

Initial Query

Write a .patch file to stdout that will fix the bug in this tokenizer. Still keep the new file name the same after patching. I'll evaluate you based on my ability to do - echo [your patch] > fix.patch - patch < fix.patch - python3 run_tokenizer.py Here is the entirety of run_tokenizer.py: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
import re

class Tokenizer:
    def __init__(self, input_str):
        '''
        input_str: a string of digits and operators
        '''
        self.position = 0
        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)

    def get_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        token = self.tokens[self.position]
        self.position += 1
        return token

    def peek_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        return self.tokens[self.position]

LLM Generation

Query

Write a .patch file to stdout that will fix the bug in this tokenizer. Still keep the new file name the same after patching. I'll evaluate you based on my ability to do - echo [your patch] > fix.patch - patch < fix.patch - python3 run_tokenizer.py Here is the entirety of run_tokenizer.py: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
import re

class Tokenizer:
    def __init__(self, input_str):
        '''
        input_str: a string of digits and operators
        '''
        self.position = 0
        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)

    def get_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        token = self.tokens[self.position]
        self.position += 1
        return token

    def peek_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        return self.tokens[self.position]

Output

It appears there is a bug in the tokenizer related to the way regular expressions are used to find tokens. The `re.findall` function in the `__init__` method is currently set to find tokens that are either digits or specific operators, but it places the operators in a capturing group, which causes them to be returned as tuples. I'll provide a patch to fix this issue by adjusting the regular expression so that it correctly captures digits and operators without creating unnecessary groups. Here is the patch file: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
--- run_tokenizer.py.orig	2023-10-06 12:00:00.000000000 +0000
+++ run_tokenizer.py	2023-10-06 12:00:00.000000000 +0000
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
         '''
         self.position = 0
         # Updated regex to avoid capturing groups
-        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)
+        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\)', input_str)

     def get_next_token(self):
         if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
To apply this patch, save it to a file named `fix.patch` and then execute the following commands: 
1
2
3
echo "[your patch]" > fix.patch
patch < fix.patch
python3 run_tokenizer.py
This should correctly tokenize the input string without producing any unnecessary groups.

Extract Code

I extracted the following code from that output: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
--- run_tokenizer.py.orig	2023-10-06 12:00:00.000000000 +0000
+++ run_tokenizer.py	2023-10-06 12:00:00.000000000 +0000
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
         '''
         self.position = 0
         # Updated regex to avoid capturing groups
-        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)
+        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\)', input_str)

     def get_next_token(self):
         if self.position >= len(self.tokens):

PyFunc

--- run_tokenizer.py.orig 2023-10-06 12:00:00.000000000 +0000 +++ run_tokenizer.py 2023-10-06 12:00:00.000000000 +0000 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ ''' self.position = 0 # Updated regex to avoid capturing groups - self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str) + self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\)', input_str) def get_next_token(self): if self.position >= len(self.tokens): Resulting in output:

PyFunc

patching file run_tokenizer.py Hunk #1 FAILED at 6. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file run_tokenizer.py.rej final: False Resulting in output: False

Docker Setup

I have setup the docker container to run the model evaluation.

Initial Query

Write a .patch file to stdout that will fix the bug in this tokenizer. Still keep the new file name the same after patching. I'll evaluate you based on my ability to do - echo [your patch] > fix.patch - patch < fix.patch - python3 run_tokenizer.py Here is the entirety of run_tokenizer.py: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
import re

class Tokenizer:
    def __init__(self, input_str):
        '''
        input_str: a string of digits and operators
        '''
        self.position = 0
        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)

    def get_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        token = self.tokens[self.position]
        self.position += 1
        return token

    def peek_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        return self.tokens[self.position]

LLM Generation

Query

Write a .patch file to stdout that will fix the bug in this tokenizer. Still keep the new file name the same after patching. I'll evaluate you based on my ability to do - echo [your patch] > fix.patch - patch < fix.patch - python3 run_tokenizer.py Here is the entirety of run_tokenizer.py: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
import re

class Tokenizer:
    def __init__(self, input_str):
        '''
        input_str: a string of digits and operators
        '''
        self.position = 0
        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)

    def get_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        token = self.tokens[self.position]
        self.position += 1
        return token

    def peek_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        return self.tokens[self.position]

Output

Sure, based on the given code, it seems like the tokenizer has an issue in the regex pattern used to find tokens. Specifically, the regex pattern is incorrect because it makes the operators and functions optional. To fix this, we need to adjust the regex pattern to properly match digits and operators/functions. Here's the .patch file to correct the issue: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
--- run_tokenizer.py.orig	2023-10-06 12:00:00.000000000 +0000
+++ run_tokenizer.py	2023-10-06 12:10:00.000000000 +0000
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
         '''
         input_str: a string of digits and operators
         '''
-        self.position = 0
-        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)
+        self.position = 0
+        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\)', input_str)

     def get_next_token(self):
         if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
This patch removes the parentheses around the operator/function regex pattern, making them required matches rather than optional. You can apply this patch using the following steps: 1. Save the patch to a file named `fix.patch`. 2. Apply the patch using the `patch` command: 
1
2
   patch < fix.patch
3. Run the tokenizer script: 
1
2
   python3 run_tokenizer.py
This should resolve the issue with the tokenizer.

Extract Code

I extracted the following code from that output: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
--- run_tokenizer.py.orig	2023-10-06 12:00:00.000000000 +0000
+++ run_tokenizer.py	2023-10-06 12:10:00.000000000 +0000
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
         '''
         input_str: a string of digits and operators
         '''
-        self.position = 0
-        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)
+        self.position = 0
+        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\)', input_str)

     def get_next_token(self):
         if self.position >= len(self.tokens):

PyFunc

--- run_tokenizer.py.orig 2023-10-06 12:00:00.000000000 +0000 +++ run_tokenizer.py 2023-10-06 12:10:00.000000000 +0000 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ ''' input_str: a string of digits and operators ''' - self.position = 0 - self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str) + self.position = 0 + self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\)', input_str) def get_next_token(self): if self.position >= len(self.tokens): Resulting in output:

PyFunc

patching file run_tokenizer.py Hunk #1 succeeded at 5 with fuzz 1 (offset -1 lines). final: True Resulting in output: True

Docker Setup

I have setup the docker container to run the model evaluation.

Initial Query

Write a .patch file to stdout that will fix the bug in this tokenizer. Still keep the new file name the same after patching. I'll evaluate you based on my ability to do - echo [your patch] > fix.patch - patch < fix.patch - python3 run_tokenizer.py Here is the entirety of run_tokenizer.py: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
import re

class Tokenizer:
    def __init__(self, input_str):
        '''
        input_str: a string of digits and operators
        '''
        self.position = 0
        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)

    def get_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        token = self.tokens[self.position]
        self.position += 1
        return token

    def peek_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        return self.tokens[self.position]

LLM Generation

Query

Write a .patch file to stdout that will fix the bug in this tokenizer. Still keep the new file name the same after patching. I'll evaluate you based on my ability to do - echo [your patch] > fix.patch - patch < fix.patch - python3 run_tokenizer.py Here is the entirety of run_tokenizer.py: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
import re

class Tokenizer:
    def __init__(self, input_str):
        '''
        input_str: a string of digits and operators
        '''
        self.position = 0
        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)

    def get_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        token = self.tokens[self.position]
        self.position += 1
        return token

    def peek_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        return self.tokens[self.position]

Output

Certainly! The issue with the given tokenizer is that the `re.findall` method will return `None` for the operators because of the capturing group `()` in the regular expression. We need to remove the capturing group to ensure all tokens are captured correctly. Here is the patch file for fixing the bug: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
--- run_tokenizer.py	2023-10-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000
+++ run_tokenizer.py	2023-10-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
         '''
         self.position = 0
         # Modified regex to remove capturing group
-        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)
+        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\)', input_str)

     def get_next_token(self):
         if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
You can save the above patch into a file called `fix.patch` and apply it as follows: 
1
2
3
4
echo -e "--- run_tokenizer.py\t2023-10-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000\n+++ run_tokenizer.py\t2023-10-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000\n@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@\n         '''\n         self.position = 0\n         # Modified regex to remove capturing group\n-        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\\d+|(\\+|\\-|\\*|/|sin|cos|\\(|\\))', input_str)\n+        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\\d+|\\+|\\-|\\*|/|sin|cos|\\(|\\)', input_str)\n\n     def get_next_token(self):\n         if self.position >= len(self.tokens):" > fix.patch

patch < fix.patch
python3 run_tokenizer.py
This patch removes the capturing group from the regular expression, ensuring that all tokens (digits and operators) are properly captured.

Extract Code

I extracted the following code from that output: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
--- run_tokenizer.py	2023-10-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000
+++ run_tokenizer.py	2023-10-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
         '''
         self.position = 0
         # Modified regex to remove capturing group
-        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)
+        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\)', input_str)

     def get_next_token(self):
         if self.position >= len(self.tokens):

PyFunc

--- run_tokenizer.py 2023-10-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000 +++ run_tokenizer.py 2023-10-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ ''' self.position = 0 # Modified regex to remove capturing group - self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str) + self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\)', input_str) def get_next_token(self): if self.position >= len(self.tokens): Resulting in output:

PyFunc

patching file run_tokenizer.py Hunk #1 FAILED at 7. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file run_tokenizer.py.rej final: False Resulting in output: False

Docker Setup

I have setup the docker container to run the model evaluation.

Initial Query

Write a .patch file to stdout that will fix the bug in this tokenizer. Still keep the new file name the same after patching. I'll evaluate you based on my ability to do - echo [your patch] > fix.patch - patch < fix.patch - python3 run_tokenizer.py Here is the entirety of run_tokenizer.py: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
import re

class Tokenizer:
    def __init__(self, input_str):
        '''
        input_str: a string of digits and operators
        '''
        self.position = 0
        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)

    def get_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        token = self.tokens[self.position]
        self.position += 1
        return token

    def peek_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        return self.tokens[self.position]

LLM Generation

Query

Write a .patch file to stdout that will fix the bug in this tokenizer. Still keep the new file name the same after patching. I'll evaluate you based on my ability to do - echo [your patch] > fix.patch - patch < fix.patch - python3 run_tokenizer.py Here is the entirety of run_tokenizer.py: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
import re

class Tokenizer:
    def __init__(self, input_str):
        '''
        input_str: a string of digits and operators
        '''
        self.position = 0
        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)

    def get_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        token = self.tokens[self.position]
        self.position += 1
        return token

    def peek_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        return self.tokens[self.position]

Output

Sure, it looks like there is a small bug in the regular expression used for tokenizing the input string. The parentheses are creating capturing groups which should be non-capturing groups instead. We can fix this by changing `()` to `(?:)` in the regex. Here is the .patch file to fix the issue: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
--- run_tokenizer.py	2023-10-01 12:00:00.000000000 +0000
+++ run_tokenizer.py	2023-10-01 12:00:00.000000000 +0000
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
         '''
         self.position = 0
         # Fix the regex to use non-capturing groups
-        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)
+        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(?:\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)

     def get_next_token(self):
         if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
You can apply this patch as follows: 
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
echo "--- run_tokenizer.py	2023-10-01 12:00:00.000000000 +0000
+++ run_tokenizer.py	2023-10-01 12:00:00.000000000 +0000
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
         '''
         self.position = 0
         # Fix the regex to use non-capturing groups
-        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)
+        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(?:\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)

     def get_next_token(self):
         if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
" > fix.patch

patch < fix.patch
python3 run_tokenizer.py
This should fix the issue and allow the tokenizer to correctly parse the input string.

Extract Code

I extracted the following code from that output: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
--- run_tokenizer.py	2023-10-01 12:00:00.000000000 +0000
+++ run_tokenizer.py	2023-10-01 12:00:00.000000000 +0000
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
         '''
         self.position = 0
         # Fix the regex to use non-capturing groups
-        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)
+        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(?:\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)

     def get_next_token(self):
         if self.position >= len(self.tokens):

PyFunc

--- run_tokenizer.py 2023-10-01 12:00:00.000000000 +0000 +++ run_tokenizer.py 2023-10-01 12:00:00.000000000 +0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ ''' self.position = 0 # Fix the regex to use non-capturing groups - self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str) + self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(?:\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str) def get_next_token(self): if self.position >= len(self.tokens): Resulting in output:

PyFunc

patching file run_tokenizer.py Hunk #1 FAILED at 7. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file run_tokenizer.py.rej final: False Resulting in output: False

Docker Setup

I have setup the docker container to run the model evaluation.

Initial Query

Write a .patch file to stdout that will fix the bug in this tokenizer. Still keep the new file name the same after patching. I'll evaluate you based on my ability to do - echo [your patch] > fix.patch - patch < fix.patch - python3 run_tokenizer.py Here is the entirety of run_tokenizer.py: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
import re

class Tokenizer:
    def __init__(self, input_str):
        '''
        input_str: a string of digits and operators
        '''
        self.position = 0
        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)

    def get_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        token = self.tokens[self.position]
        self.position += 1
        return token

    def peek_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        return self.tokens[self.position]

LLM Generation

Query

Write a .patch file to stdout that will fix the bug in this tokenizer. Still keep the new file name the same after patching. I'll evaluate you based on my ability to do - echo [your patch] > fix.patch - patch < fix.patch - python3 run_tokenizer.py Here is the entirety of run_tokenizer.py: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
import re

class Tokenizer:
    def __init__(self, input_str):
        '''
        input_str: a string of digits and operators
        '''
        self.position = 0
        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)

    def get_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        token = self.tokens[self.position]
        self.position += 1
        return token

    def peek_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        return self.tokens[self.position]

Output

The bug in the provided tokenizer is related to the regular expression used for tokenization. The current regex `r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))'` mistakenly groups operators and functions like `sin` and `cos` in a capturing group, which results in `None` for these tokens when they are matched. Here's the corrected version: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
--- run_tokenizer.py	2023-10-04 12:00:00.000000000 +0000
+++ run_tokenizer.py	2023-10-04 12:00:00.000000000 +0000
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
         '''
         self.position = 0
         # Fix the regular expression to handle operators and functions correctly
-        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)
+        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\)', input_str)
 
     def get_next_token(self):
         if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
You can save this patch to a file named `fix.patch` and apply it using the `patch` command as described: 
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
echo '--- run_tokenizer.py	2023-10-04 12:00:00.000000000 +0000
+++ run_tokenizer.py	2023-10-04 12:00:00.000000000 +0000
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
         '''
         self.position = 0
         # Fix the regular expression to handle operators and functions correctly
-        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)
+        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\)', input_str)
 
     def get_next_token(self):
         if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
' > fix.patch

patch < fix.patch
python3 run_tokenizer.py
This should fix the tokenization issue in your script.

Extract Code

I extracted the following code from that output: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
--- run_tokenizer.py	2023-10-04 12:00:00.000000000 +0000
+++ run_tokenizer.py	2023-10-04 12:00:00.000000000 +0000
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
         '''
         self.position = 0
         # Fix the regular expression to handle operators and functions correctly
-        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)
+        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\)', input_str)
 
     def get_next_token(self):
         if self.position >= len(self.tokens):

PyFunc

--- run_tokenizer.py 2023-10-04 12:00:00.000000000 +0000 +++ run_tokenizer.py 2023-10-04 12:00:00.000000000 +0000 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ ''' self.position = 0 # Fix the regular expression to handle operators and functions correctly - self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str) + self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\)', input_str) def get_next_token(self): if self.position >= len(self.tokens): Resulting in output:

PyFunc

patching file run_tokenizer.py Hunk #1 FAILED at 6. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file run_tokenizer.py.rej final: False Resulting in output: False