Docker Setup

I have setup the docker container to run the model evaluation.

Initial Query

Write a .patch file to stdout that will fix the bug in this tokenizer. Still keep the new file name the same after patching. I'll evaluate you based on my ability to do - echo [your patch] > fix.patch - patch < fix.patch - python3 run_tokenizer.py Here is the entirety of run_tokenizer.py:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
import re

class Tokenizer:
    def __init__(self, input_str):
        '''
        input_str: a string of digits and operators
        '''
        self.position = 0
        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)

    def get_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        token = self.tokens[self.position]
        self.position += 1
        return token

    def peek_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        return self.tokens[self.position]

LLM Generation

Query

Write a .patch file to stdout that will fix the bug in this tokenizer. Still keep the new file name the same after patching. I'll evaluate you based on my ability to do - echo [your patch] > fix.patch - patch < fix.patch - python3 run_tokenizer.py Here is the entirety of run_tokenizer.py:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
import re

class Tokenizer:
    def __init__(self, input_str):
        '''
        input_str: a string of digits and operators
        '''
        self.position = 0
        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)

    def get_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        token = self.tokens[self.position]
        self.position += 1
        return token

    def peek_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        return self.tokens[self.position]

Output

Here is the .patch file to fix the bug in the tokenizer:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
--- run_tokenizer.py    2023-05-12 10:00:00.000000000 -0400
+++ run_tokenizer.py    2023-05-12 11:00:00.000000000 -0400
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
         input_str: a string of digits and operators
         '''
         self.position = 0
-        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)
+        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\)', input_str)
 
     def get_next_token(self):
         if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
The bug in the original code is in the regular expression used to find the tokens. The parentheses around the operators cause them to be grouped, which leads to inconsistent behavior when extracting the tokens. By removing the parentheses from the regular expression, the operators will be matched individually without grouping, fixing the tokenization issue. To apply the patch, you can follow these steps: 1. Save the patch content to a file named `fix.patch`. 2. In the directory containing `run_tokenizer.py`, run the command: `patch < fix.patch`. 3. The `run_tokenizer.py` file will be updated with the fix. After applying the patch, you can run `python3 run_tokenizer.py` to test the tokenizer with the fix applied.

Extract Code

I extracted the following code from that output:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
--- run_tokenizer.py    2023-05-12 10:00:00.000000000 -0400
+++ run_tokenizer.py    2023-05-12 11:00:00.000000000 -0400
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
         input_str: a string of digits and operators
         '''
         self.position = 0
-        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)
+        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\)', input_str)
 
     def get_next_token(self):
         if self.position >= len(self.tokens):

PyFunc

--- run_tokenizer.py 2023-05-12 10:00:00.000000000 -0400 +++ run_tokenizer.py 2023-05-12 11:00:00.000000000 -0400 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ input_str: a string of digits and operators ''' self.position = 0 - self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str) + self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\)', input_str) def get_next_token(self): if self.position >= len(self.tokens): Resulting in output:

PyFunc

patching file run_tokenizer.py Hunk #1 succeeded at 6 (offset 1 line). final: True Resulting in output: True

Docker Setup

I have setup the docker container to run the model evaluation.

Initial Query

Write a .patch file to stdout that will fix the bug in this tokenizer. Still keep the new file name the same after patching. I'll evaluate you based on my ability to do - echo [your patch] > fix.patch - patch < fix.patch - python3 run_tokenizer.py Here is the entirety of run_tokenizer.py:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
import re

class Tokenizer:
    def __init__(self, input_str):
        '''
        input_str: a string of digits and operators
        '''
        self.position = 0
        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)

    def get_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        token = self.tokens[self.position]
        self.position += 1
        return token

    def peek_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        return self.tokens[self.position]

LLM Generation

Query

Write a .patch file to stdout that will fix the bug in this tokenizer. Still keep the new file name the same after patching. I'll evaluate you based on my ability to do - echo [your patch] > fix.patch - patch < fix.patch - python3 run_tokenizer.py Here is the entirety of run_tokenizer.py:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
import re

class Tokenizer:
    def __init__(self, input_str):
        '''
        input_str: a string of digits and operators
        '''
        self.position = 0
        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)

    def get_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        token = self.tokens[self.position]
        self.position += 1
        return token

    def peek_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        return self.tokens[self.position]

Output

--- run_tokenizer.py 2023-06-09 14:20:00.000000000 +0000 +++ run_tokenizer_fixed.py 2023-06-09 14:25:00.000000000 +0000 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ class Tokenizer: def __init__(self, input_str): - ''' + """ input_str: a string of digits and operators - ''' + """ self.position = 0 - self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str) + self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|[+\-*/()]|sin|cos', input_str) def get_next_token(self): if self.position >= len(self.tokens): To generate the patch and apply it: echo '--- run_tokenizer.py 2023-06-09 14:20:00.000000000 +0000 +++ run_tokenizer_fixed.py 2023-06-09 14:25:00.000000000 +0000 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ class Tokenizer: def __init__(self, input_str): - '"'"' + """ input_str: a string of digits and operators - '"'"' + """ self.position = 0 - self.tokens = re.findall(r'\''\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))'\'', input_str) + self.tokens = re.findall(r'\''\d+|[+\-*/()]|sin|cos'\'', input_str) def get_next_token(self): if self.position >= len(self.tokens):' > fix.patch patch < fix.patch The changes made: 1. Changed the docstring quotes from ''' to """ for consistency 2. Simplified the regular expression to r'\d+|[+\-*/()]|sin|cos': - Removed capturing group (\+|\-|\*|/) and replaced with character class [+\-*/] - Removed capturing group for parentheses (\(|\)) and added to character class - Removed capturing groups for sin and cos This should fix any bugs related to the regular expression and make the tokenizer work correctly.

Extract Code

I extracted the following code from that output:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
--- run_tokenizer.py    2023-06-09 14:20:00.000000000 +0000
+++ run_tokenizer_fixed.py     2023-06-09 14:25:00.000000000 +0000
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 class Tokenizer:
     def __init__(self, input_str):
-        '''
+        """
         input_str: a string of digits and operators
-        '''
+        """
         self.position = 0
-        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)
+        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|[+\-*/()]|sin|cos', input_str)
 
     def get_next_token(self):
         if self.position >= len(self.tokens):

PyFunc

--- run_tokenizer.py 2023-06-09 14:20:00.000000000 +0000 +++ run_tokenizer_fixed.py 2023-06-09 14:25:00.000000000 +0000 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ class Tokenizer: def __init__(self, input_str): - ''' + """ input_str: a string of digits and operators - ''' + """ self.position = 0 - self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str) + self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|[+\-*/()]|sin|cos', input_str) def get_next_token(self): if self.position >= len(self.tokens): Resulting in output:

PyFunc

patching file run_tokenizer.py Hunk #1 succeeded at 2 with fuzz 2. final: False Resulting in output: False

Docker Setup

I have setup the docker container to run the model evaluation.

Initial Query

Write a .patch file to stdout that will fix the bug in this tokenizer. Still keep the new file name the same after patching. I'll evaluate you based on my ability to do - echo [your patch] > fix.patch - patch < fix.patch - python3 run_tokenizer.py Here is the entirety of run_tokenizer.py:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
import re

class Tokenizer:
    def __init__(self, input_str):
        '''
        input_str: a string of digits and operators
        '''
        self.position = 0
        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)

    def get_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        token = self.tokens[self.position]
        self.position += 1
        return token

    def peek_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        return self.tokens[self.position]

LLM Generation

Query

Write a .patch file to stdout that will fix the bug in this tokenizer. Still keep the new file name the same after patching. I'll evaluate you based on my ability to do - echo [your patch] > fix.patch - patch < fix.patch - python3 run_tokenizer.py Here is the entirety of run_tokenizer.py:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
import re

class Tokenizer:
    def __init__(self, input_str):
        '''
        input_str: a string of digits and operators
        '''
        self.position = 0
        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)

    def get_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        token = self.tokens[self.position]
        self.position += 1
        return token

    def peek_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        return self.tokens[self.position]

Output

Here is the patch file to fix the bug in the tokenizer:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
--- run_tokenizer.py
+++ run_tokenizer.py
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
         input_str: a string of digits and operators
         '''
         self.position = 0
-        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)
+        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\)', input_str)

     def get_next_token(self):
         if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
Explanation: The bug in the original code is in the regular expression used to tokenize the input string. The operators are enclosed in a capturing group `()`, which causes them to be wrapped in an additional list when `re.findall()` returns the matches. To fix this, remove the capturing group by removing the parentheses around the operators in the regular expression:
1
r'\d+|\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\)'
Now, when you apply the patch using the commands:
1
2
echo [patch content] > fix.patch
patch < fix.patch
And then run `python3 run_tokenizer.py`, the tokenizer should work correctly without the bug.

Extract Code

I extracted the following code from that output:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
--- run_tokenizer.py
+++ run_tokenizer.py
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
         input_str: a string of digits and operators
         '''
         self.position = 0
-        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)
+        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\)', input_str)

     def get_next_token(self):
         if self.position >= len(self.tokens):

PyFunc

--- run_tokenizer.py +++ run_tokenizer.py @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ input_str: a string of digits and operators ''' self.position = 0 - self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str) + self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\)', input_str) def get_next_token(self): if self.position >= len(self.tokens): Resulting in output:

PyFunc

patching file run_tokenizer.py final: True Resulting in output: True

Docker Setup

I have setup the docker container to run the model evaluation.

Initial Query

Write a .patch file to stdout that will fix the bug in this tokenizer. Still keep the new file name the same after patching. I'll evaluate you based on my ability to do - echo [your patch] > fix.patch - patch < fix.patch - python3 run_tokenizer.py Here is the entirety of run_tokenizer.py:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
import re

class Tokenizer:
    def __init__(self, input_str):
        '''
        input_str: a string of digits and operators
        '''
        self.position = 0
        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)

    def get_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        token = self.tokens[self.position]
        self.position += 1
        return token

    def peek_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        return self.tokens[self.position]

LLM Generation

Query

Write a .patch file to stdout that will fix the bug in this tokenizer. Still keep the new file name the same after patching. I'll evaluate you based on my ability to do - echo [your patch] > fix.patch - patch < fix.patch - python3 run_tokenizer.py Here is the entirety of run_tokenizer.py:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
import re

class Tokenizer:
    def __init__(self, input_str):
        '''
        input_str: a string of digits and operators
        '''
        self.position = 0
        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)

    def get_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        token = self.tokens[self.position]
        self.position += 1
        return token

    def peek_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        return self.tokens[self.position]

Output

--- run_tokenizer.py 2023-06-28 14:20:00.000000000 -0700 +++ run_tokenizer.py.new 2023-06-28 14:25:00.000000000 -0700 @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ import re -class Tokenizer: +class TokenizerFixed: def __init__(self, input_str): ''' input_str: a string of digits and operators

Extract Code

I extracted the following code from that output:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
Here is the complete .patch file with just the patch content and nothing else:

--- run_tokenizer.py	2023-06-28 14:20:00.000000000 -0700
+++ run_tokenizer.py.new	2023-06-28 14:25:00.000000000 -0700
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 import re
 
-class Tokenizer:
+class TokenizerFixed:
     def __init__(self, input_str):
         '''
         input_str: a string of digits and operators

PyFunc

Here is the complete .patch file with just the patch content and nothing else: --- run_tokenizer.py 2023-06-28 14:20:00.000000000 -0700 +++ run_tokenizer.py.new 2023-06-28 14:25:00.000000000 -0700 @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ import re -class Tokenizer: +class TokenizerFixed: def __init__(self, input_str): ''' input_str: a string of digits and operators Resulting in output:

PyFunc

patching file run_tokenizer.py Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/src/app/check.py", line 10, in <module> print('final: ' + str(check())) ^^^^^^^ File "/usr/src/app/check.py", line 7, in check return run_tokenizer.Tokenizer("cos(1)+sin(23)*5").tokens == ['cos', '(', '1', ')', '+', 'sin', '(', '23', ')', '*', '5'] ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ AttributeError: module 'run_tokenizer' has no attribute 'Tokenizer' Resulting in output: False

Docker Setup

I have setup the docker container to run the model evaluation.

Initial Query

Write a .patch file to stdout that will fix the bug in this tokenizer. Still keep the new file name the same after patching. I'll evaluate you based on my ability to do - echo [your patch] > fix.patch - patch < fix.patch - python3 run_tokenizer.py Here is the entirety of run_tokenizer.py:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
import re

class Tokenizer:
    def __init__(self, input_str):
        '''
        input_str: a string of digits and operators
        '''
        self.position = 0
        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)

    def get_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        token = self.tokens[self.position]
        self.position += 1
        return token

    def peek_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        return self.tokens[self.position]

LLM Generation

Query

Write a .patch file to stdout that will fix the bug in this tokenizer. Still keep the new file name the same after patching. I'll evaluate you based on my ability to do - echo [your patch] > fix.patch - patch < fix.patch - python3 run_tokenizer.py Here is the entirety of run_tokenizer.py:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
import re

class Tokenizer:
    def __init__(self, input_str):
        '''
        input_str: a string of digits and operators
        '''
        self.position = 0
        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)

    def get_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        token = self.tokens[self.position]
        self.position += 1
        return token

    def peek_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        return self.tokens[self.position]

Output

Here is the patch file to fix the bug in the tokenizer:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
--- run_tokenizer.py	2023-06-28 12:34:56.789012345 -0400
+++ run_tokenizer.py	2023-06-28 12:45:01.234567890 -0400
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
         input_str: a string of digits and operators
         '''
         self.position = 0
-        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)
+        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\)', input_str)
 
     def get_next_token(self):
         if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
Explanation: The bug in the original code is in the regular expression used to find the tokens. The parentheses around the operators are causing each operator to be captured as a separate group, which results in the operators being wrapped in an additional list when `re.findall()` returns the matches. To fix this, remove the parentheses around the operators in the regular expression. This way, the operators will be matched directly without being captured in separate groups. After applying this patch, you should be able to run the `run_tokenizer.py` file without any issues.

Extract Code

I extracted the following code from that output:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
--- run_tokenizer.py	2023-06-28 12:34:56.789012345 -0400
+++ run_tokenizer.py	2023-06-28 12:45:01.234567890 -0400
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
         input_str: a string of digits and operators
         '''
         self.position = 0
-        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)
+        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\)', input_str)
 
     def get_next_token(self):
         if self.position >= len(self.tokens):

PyFunc

--- run_tokenizer.py 2023-06-28 12:34:56.789012345 -0400 +++ run_tokenizer.py 2023-06-28 12:45:01.234567890 -0400 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ input_str: a string of digits and operators ''' self.position = 0 - self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str) + self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\)', input_str) def get_next_token(self): if self.position >= len(self.tokens): Resulting in output:

PyFunc

patching file run_tokenizer.py Hunk #1 succeeded at 6 (offset 1 line). final: True Resulting in output: True