Docker Setup

I have setup the docker container to run the model evaluation.

Initial Query

Write a .patch file to stdout that will fix the bug in this tokenizer. Still keep the new file name the same after patching. I'll evaluate you based on my ability to do - echo [your patch] > fix.patch - patch < fix.patch - python3 run_tokenizer.py Here is the entirety of run_tokenizer.py:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
import re

class Tokenizer:
    def __init__(self, input_str):
        '''
        input_str: a string of digits and operators
        '''
        self.position = 0
        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)

    def get_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        token = self.tokens[self.position]
        self.position += 1
        return token

    def peek_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        return self.tokens[self.position]

LLM Generation

Query

Write a .patch file to stdout that will fix the bug in this tokenizer. Still keep the new file name the same after patching. I'll evaluate you based on my ability to do - echo [your patch] > fix.patch - patch < fix.patch - python3 run_tokenizer.py Here is the entirety of run_tokenizer.py:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
import re

class Tokenizer:
    def __init__(self, input_str):
        '''
        input_str: a string of digits and operators
        '''
        self.position = 0
        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)

    def get_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        token = self.tokens[self.position]
        self.position += 1
        return token

    def peek_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        return self.tokens[self.position]

Output

Here's a .patch file that will fix the bug in the tokenizer:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
--- run_tokenizer.py	2023-11-22 12:00:00.000000000 -0000
+++ run_tokenizer.py	2023-11-22 12:00:00.000000000 -0000
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
         input_str: a string of digits and operators
         '''
         self.position = 0
-        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)
+        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\)', input_str)
 
     def get_next_token(self):
         if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
This patch fixes the bug in the tokenizer by modifying the regular expression used in the `re.findall()` function. The original regex was capturing digits and operators, but it was using a capturing group for the operators, which resulted in `None` values for non-matched alternatives. The fix removes the parentheses around the operator alternatives, so all tokens (both numbers and operators) are captured as actual strings rather than as group matches or `None` values. You can apply this patch using the commands you provided:
1
2
3
echo [patch content] > fix.patch
patch < fix.patch
python3 run_tokenizer.py
After applying this patch, the tokenizer should correctly handle all tokens without producing any `None` values in the token list.

Extract Code

I extracted the following code from that output:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
--- run_tokenizer.py	2023-11-22 12:00:00.000000000 -0000
+++ run_tokenizer.py	2023-11-22 12:00:00.000000000 -0000
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
         input_str: a string of digits and operators
         '''
         self.position = 0
-        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)
+        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\)', input_str)
 
     def get_next_token(self):
         if self.position >= len(self.tokens):

PyFunc

--- run_tokenizer.py 2023-11-22 12:00:00.000000000 -0000 +++ run_tokenizer.py 2023-11-22 12:00:00.000000000 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ input_str: a string of digits and operators ''' self.position = 0 - self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str) + self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\)', input_str) def get_next_token(self): if self.position >= len(self.tokens): Resulting in output:

PyFunc

patching file run_tokenizer.py Hunk #1 succeeded at 6 (offset -1 lines). final: True Resulting in output: True

Docker Setup

I have setup the docker container to run the model evaluation.

Initial Query

Write a .patch file to stdout that will fix the bug in this tokenizer. Still keep the new file name the same after patching. I'll evaluate you based on my ability to do - echo [your patch] > fix.patch - patch < fix.patch - python3 run_tokenizer.py Here is the entirety of run_tokenizer.py:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
import re

class Tokenizer:
    def __init__(self, input_str):
        '''
        input_str: a string of digits and operators
        '''
        self.position = 0
        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)

    def get_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        token = self.tokens[self.position]
        self.position += 1
        return token

    def peek_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        return self.tokens[self.position]

LLM Generation

Query

Write a .patch file to stdout that will fix the bug in this tokenizer. Still keep the new file name the same after patching. I'll evaluate you based on my ability to do - echo [your patch] > fix.patch - patch < fix.patch - python3 run_tokenizer.py Here is the entirety of run_tokenizer.py:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
import re

class Tokenizer:
    def __init__(self, input_str):
        '''
        input_str: a string of digits and operators
        '''
        self.position = 0
        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)

    def get_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        token = self.tokens[self.position]
        self.position += 1
        return token

    def peek_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        return self.tokens[self.position]

Output

Here's the .patch file content to fix the bug in the tokenizer:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
--- run_tokenizer.py
+++ run_tokenizer.py
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ class Tokenizer:
         input_str: a string of digits and operators
         '''
         self.position = 0
-        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)
+        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\)', input_str)
 
     def get_next_token(self):
         if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
This patch file will: 1. Remove the unnecessary capturing group around the operators and functions in the regex pattern. 2. Keep the file name the same (run_tokenizer.py). 3. Fix the bug where digits were being captured but other tokens were not due to the capturing group. You can apply this patch using the commands you provided:
1
2
3
echo [above patch content] > fix.patch
patch < fix.patch
python3 run_tokenizer.py
After applying this patch, the tokenizer should correctly tokenize both digits and operators/functions.

Extract Code

I extracted the following code from that output:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
--- run_tokenizer.py
+++ run_tokenizer.py
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ class Tokenizer:
         input_str: a string of digits and operators
         '''
         self.position = 0
-        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)
+        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\)', input_str)
 
     def get_next_token(self):
         if self.position >= len(self.tokens):

PyFunc

--- run_tokenizer.py +++ run_tokenizer.py @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ class Tokenizer: input_str: a string of digits and operators ''' self.position = 0 - self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str) + self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\)', input_str) def get_next_token(self): if self.position >= len(self.tokens): Resulting in output:

PyFunc

patching file run_tokenizer.py Hunk #1 succeeded at 6 (offset -1 lines). final: True Resulting in output: True

Docker Setup

I have setup the docker container to run the model evaluation.

Initial Query

Write a .patch file to stdout that will fix the bug in this tokenizer. Still keep the new file name the same after patching. I'll evaluate you based on my ability to do - echo [your patch] > fix.patch - patch < fix.patch - python3 run_tokenizer.py Here is the entirety of run_tokenizer.py:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
import re

class Tokenizer:
    def __init__(self, input_str):
        '''
        input_str: a string of digits and operators
        '''
        self.position = 0
        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)

    def get_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        token = self.tokens[self.position]
        self.position += 1
        return token

    def peek_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        return self.tokens[self.position]

LLM Generation

Query

Write a .patch file to stdout that will fix the bug in this tokenizer. Still keep the new file name the same after patching. I'll evaluate you based on my ability to do - echo [your patch] > fix.patch - patch < fix.patch - python3 run_tokenizer.py Here is the entirety of run_tokenizer.py:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
import re

class Tokenizer:
    def __init__(self, input_str):
        '''
        input_str: a string of digits and operators
        '''
        self.position = 0
        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)

    def get_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        token = self.tokens[self.position]
        self.position += 1
        return token

    def peek_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        return self.tokens[self.position]

Output

Here's a .patch file that will fix the bug in the tokenizer:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
--- run_tokenizer.py	2023-11-17 12:00:00.000000000 -0000
+++ run_tokenizer.py	2023-11-17 12:00:00.000000000 -0000
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
         input_str: a string of digits and operators
         '''
         self.position = 0
-        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)
+        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\)', input_str)
 
     def get_next_token(self):
         if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
This patch fixes the bug in the tokenizer by modifying the regular expression used in the `re.findall()` function. The original regex was capturing operators and functions as optional groups, which could lead to `None` values in the `tokens` list. The updated regex removes the parentheses around the operators and functions, ensuring that all matched tokens are included in the list without being treated as optional groups. To apply this patch: 1. Save the patch content to a file named `fix.patch`. 2. Run `patch < fix.patch` in the directory containing `run_tokenizer.py`. 3. The `run_tokenizer.py` file will be updated with the fix. After applying the patch, you should be able to run `python3 run_tokenizer.py` without encountering the previous tokenization issues.

Extract Code

I extracted the following code from that output:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
--- run_tokenizer.py	2023-11-17 12:00:00.000000000 -0000
+++ run_tokenizer.py	2023-11-17 12:00:00.000000000 -0000
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
         input_str: a string of digits and operators
         '''
         self.position = 0
-        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)
+        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\)', input_str)
 
     def get_next_token(self):
         if self.position >= len(self.tokens):

PyFunc

--- run_tokenizer.py 2023-11-17 12:00:00.000000000 -0000 +++ run_tokenizer.py 2023-11-17 12:00:00.000000000 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ input_str: a string of digits and operators ''' self.position = 0 - self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str) + self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\)', input_str) def get_next_token(self): if self.position >= len(self.tokens): Resulting in output:

PyFunc

patching file run_tokenizer.py Hunk #1 succeeded at 6 (offset -1 lines). final: True Resulting in output: True

Docker Setup

I have setup the docker container to run the model evaluation.

Initial Query

Write a .patch file to stdout that will fix the bug in this tokenizer. Still keep the new file name the same after patching. I'll evaluate you based on my ability to do - echo [your patch] > fix.patch - patch < fix.patch - python3 run_tokenizer.py Here is the entirety of run_tokenizer.py:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
import re

class Tokenizer:
    def __init__(self, input_str):
        '''
        input_str: a string of digits and operators
        '''
        self.position = 0
        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)

    def get_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        token = self.tokens[self.position]
        self.position += 1
        return token

    def peek_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        return self.tokens[self.position]

LLM Generation

Query

Write a .patch file to stdout that will fix the bug in this tokenizer. Still keep the new file name the same after patching. I'll evaluate you based on my ability to do - echo [your patch] > fix.patch - patch < fix.patch - python3 run_tokenizer.py Here is the entirety of run_tokenizer.py:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
import re

class Tokenizer:
    def __init__(self, input_str):
        '''
        input_str: a string of digits and operators
        '''
        self.position = 0
        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)

    def get_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        token = self.tokens[self.position]
        self.position += 1
        return token

    def peek_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        return self.tokens[self.position]

Output

Here's a .patch file that will fix the bug in the tokenizer:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
--- run_tokenizer.py	2023-11-23 12:00:00.000000000 -0000
+++ run_tokenizer.py	2023-11-23 12:00:01.000000000 -0000
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
         input_str: a string of digits and operators
         '''
         self.position = 0
-        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)
+        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\)', input_str)
 
     def get_next_token(self):
         if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
This patch file will: 1. Remove the capturing group around the operators and functions in the regular expression. 2. Keep the file name the same (run_tokenizer.py). The bug in the original code was that the capturing group `(...)` around the operators and functions was causing these tokens to be captured as `None` in the resulting list. By removing the parentheses, we ensure that all tokens (numbers, operators, and functions) are correctly captured as strings. You can apply this patch using the commands you provided:
1
2
3
echo [patch content] > fix.patch
patch < fix.patch
python3 run_tokenizer.py
After applying this patch, the tokenizer should correctly handle all tokens, including operators and functions.

Extract Code

I extracted the following code from that output:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
--- run_tokenizer.py	2023-11-23 12:00:00.000000000 -0000
+++ run_tokenizer.py	2023-11-23 12:00:01.000000000 -0000
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
         input_str: a string of digits and operators
         '''
         self.position = 0
-        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)
+        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\)', input_str)
 
     def get_next_token(self):
         if self.position >= len(self.tokens):

PyFunc

--- run_tokenizer.py 2023-11-23 12:00:00.000000000 -0000 +++ run_tokenizer.py 2023-11-23 12:00:01.000000000 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ input_str: a string of digits and operators ''' self.position = 0 - self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str) + self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\)', input_str) def get_next_token(self): if self.position >= len(self.tokens): Resulting in output:

PyFunc

patching file run_tokenizer.py Hunk #1 succeeded at 6 (offset -1 lines). final: True Resulting in output: True

Docker Setup

I have setup the docker container to run the model evaluation.

Initial Query

Write a .patch file to stdout that will fix the bug in this tokenizer. Still keep the new file name the same after patching. I'll evaluate you based on my ability to do - echo [your patch] > fix.patch - patch < fix.patch - python3 run_tokenizer.py Here is the entirety of run_tokenizer.py:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
import re

class Tokenizer:
    def __init__(self, input_str):
        '''
        input_str: a string of digits and operators
        '''
        self.position = 0
        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)

    def get_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        token = self.tokens[self.position]
        self.position += 1
        return token

    def peek_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        return self.tokens[self.position]

LLM Generation

Query

Write a .patch file to stdout that will fix the bug in this tokenizer. Still keep the new file name the same after patching. I'll evaluate you based on my ability to do - echo [your patch] > fix.patch - patch < fix.patch - python3 run_tokenizer.py Here is the entirety of run_tokenizer.py:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
import re

class Tokenizer:
    def __init__(self, input_str):
        '''
        input_str: a string of digits and operators
        '''
        self.position = 0
        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)

    def get_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        token = self.tokens[self.position]
        self.position += 1
        return token

    def peek_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        return self.tokens[self.position]

Output

Here's the .patch file content to fix the bug in the tokenizer:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
--- run_tokenizer.py	2023-11-25 12:00:00.000000000 +0000
+++ run_tokenizer.py	2023-11-25 12:01:00.000000000 +0000
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
         input_str: a string of digits and operators
         '''
         self.position = 0
-        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)
+        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\)', input_str)
 
     def get_next_token(self):
         if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
This patch file will: 1. Remove the parentheses around the operators in the regular expression. 2. Keep the file name as `run_tokenizer.py`. The bug in the original code was that the parentheses in the regular expression were capturing the operators as a group, which resulted in `None` values being included in the `tokens` list for successful matches. By removing these parentheses, we ensure that all tokens (numbers and operators) are captured correctly without any `None` values. You can apply this patch using the commands you provided:
1
2
3
echo [patch content] > fix.patch
patch < fix.patch
python3 run_tokenizer.py
After applying this patch, the tokenizer should work correctly, properly tokenizing both numbers and operators without including any `None` values in the token list.

Extract Code

I extracted the following code from that output:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
--- run_tokenizer.py	2023-11-25 12:00:00.000000000 +0000
+++ run_tokenizer.py	2023-11-25 12:01:00.000000000 +0000
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
         input_str: a string of digits and operators
         '''
         self.position = 0
-        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)
+        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\)', input_str)
 
     def get_next_token(self):
         if self.position >= len(self.tokens):

PyFunc

--- run_tokenizer.py 2023-11-25 12:00:00.000000000 +0000 +++ run_tokenizer.py 2023-11-25 12:01:00.000000000 +0000 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ input_str: a string of digits and operators ''' self.position = 0 - self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str) + self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\)', input_str) def get_next_token(self): if self.position >= len(self.tokens): Resulting in output:

PyFunc

patching file run_tokenizer.py final: True Resulting in output: True