Initial Query

Fix this tokenizer keeping it as similar as possible class Tokenizer: def __init__(self, input_str): self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str) self.position = 0 def get_next_token(self): if self.position >= len(self.tokens): return None token = self.tokens[self.position] self.position += 1 return token def peek_next_token(self): if self.position >= len(self.tokens): return None return self.tokens[self.position]

LLM Generation

Query

Fix this tokenizer keeping it as similar as possible class Tokenizer: def __init__(self, input_str): self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str) self.position = 0 def get_next_token(self): if self.position >= len(self.tokens): return None token = self.tokens[self.position] self.position += 1 return token def peek_next_token(self): if self.position >= len(self.tokens): return None return self.tokens[self.position]

Output

Here's the fixed version of the tokenizer, keeping it as similar as possible: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
import re

class Tokenizer:
    def __init__(self, input_str):
        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+(\.\d+)?|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)
        self.position = 0

    def get_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        token = self.tokens[self.position]
        self.position += 1
        return token

    def peek_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        return self.tokens[self.position]
The main change made to the tokenizer is in the regular expression used to find the tokens: 
1
self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+(\.\d+)?|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)
The regular expression has been updated to capture decimal numbers correctly. Here's a breakdown of the changes: - `\d+(\.\d+)?`: This pattern matches one or more digits (`\d+`) optionally followed by a decimal point and one or more digits (`(\.\d+)?`). This allows the tokenizer to handle decimal numbers correctly. The rest of the code remains the same: - The `__init__` method initializes the tokenizer with an input string (`input_str`) and uses the regular expression to find all the tokens. The tokens are stored in the `self.tokens` list, and the `self.position` variable is initialized to 0 to keep track of the current position in the token list. - The `get_next_token` method returns the next token from the `self.tokens` list based on the current position. If the position is greater than or equal to the length of the tokens list, it means there are no more tokens, and the method returns `None`. Otherwise, it retrieves the token at the current position, increments the position by 1, and returns the token. - The `peek_next_token` method returns the next token without consuming it. It checks if the position is greater than or equal to the length of the tokens list. If so, it returns `None`. Otherwise, it returns the token at the current position without incrementing the position. With these changes, the tokenizer should now handle decimal numbers correctly while keeping the overall structure and functionality the same.

Extract Code

I extracted the following code from that output: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
import re

class Tokenizer:
    def __init__(self, input_str):
        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+(\.\d+)?|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)
        self.position = 0

    def get_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        token = self.tokens[self.position]
        self.position += 1
        return token

    def peek_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        return self.tokens[self.position]

Run Code Interpreter

Running the following program: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
import re

class Tokenizer:
    def __init__(self, input_str):
        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+(\.\d+)?|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)
        self.position = 0

    def get_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        token = self.tokens[self.position]
        self.position += 1
        return token

    def peek_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        return self.tokens[self.position]





answer = Tokenizer('sin(3+2*4)-cos(15)').tokens
expected = ['sin', '(', '3', '+', '2', '*', '4', ')', '-', 'cos', '(', '15', ')']
assert answer == expected, f'Wrong answer; got {answer} instead of {expected}'
print('All tests passed')
And got the output: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/src/app/main.py", line 27, in <module> assert answer == expected, f'Wrong answer; got {answer} instead of {expected}' ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ AssertionError: Wrong answer; got [('', 'sin'), ('', '('), ('', ''), ('', '+'), ('', ''), ('', '*'), ('', ''), ('', ')'), ('', '-'), ('', 'cos'), ('', '('), ('', ''), ('', ')')] instead of ['sin', '(', '3', '+', '2', '*', '4', ')', '-', 'cos', '(', '15', ')']

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string All tests passed: False

Initial Query

Fix this tokenizer keeping it as similar as possible class Tokenizer: def __init__(self, input_str): self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str) self.position = 0 def get_next_token(self): if self.position >= len(self.tokens): return None token = self.tokens[self.position] self.position += 1 return token def peek_next_token(self): if self.position >= len(self.tokens): return None return self.tokens[self.position]

LLM Generation

Query

Fix this tokenizer keeping it as similar as possible class Tokenizer: def __init__(self, input_str): self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str) self.position = 0 def get_next_token(self): if self.position >= len(self.tokens): return None token = self.tokens[self.position] self.position += 1 return token def peek_next_token(self): if self.position >= len(self.tokens): return None return self.tokens[self.position]

Output

Here's the fixed version of the tokenizer class, keeping it as similar as possible: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
import re

class Tokenizer:
    def __init__(self, input_str):
        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+(\.\d+)?|[+\-*/()]|sin|cos', input_str)
        self.position = 0

    def get_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        token = self.tokens[self.position]
        self.position += 1
        return token

    def peek_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        return self.tokens[self.position]
The changes made to the tokenizer class are as follows: 1. The regular expression pattern in the `__init__` method has been modified to correctly tokenize the input string: - `r'\d+(\.\d+)?'` matches integers or floating-point numbers. It allows for an optional decimal part. - `[+\-*/()]` matches the arithmetic operators `+`, `-`, `*`, `/`, and parentheses `(` and `)`. - `sin|cos` matches the trigonometric functions "sin" and "cos". 2. The rest of the code remains the same as the original version. With these changes, the tokenizer should now correctly tokenize the input string, handling integers, floating-point numbers, arithmetic operators, parentheses, and the trigonometric functions "sin" and "cos".

Extract Code

I extracted the following code from that output: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
import re

class Tokenizer:
    def __init__(self, input_str):
        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+(\.\d+)?|[+\-*/()]|sin|cos', input_str)
        self.position = 0

    def get_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        token = self.tokens[self.position]
        self.position += 1
        return token

    def peek_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        return self.tokens[self.position]

Run Code Interpreter

Running the following program: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
import re

class Tokenizer:
    def __init__(self, input_str):
        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+(\.\d+)?|[+\-*/()]|sin|cos', input_str)
        self.position = 0

    def get_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        token = self.tokens[self.position]
        self.position += 1
        return token

    def peek_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        return self.tokens[self.position]





answer = Tokenizer('sin(3+2*4)-cos(15)').tokens
expected = ['sin', '(', '3', '+', '2', '*', '4', ')', '-', 'cos', '(', '15', ')']
assert answer == expected, f'Wrong answer; got {answer} instead of {expected}'
print('All tests passed')
And got the output: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/src/app/main.py", line 27, in <module> assert answer == expected, f'Wrong answer; got {answer} instead of {expected}' ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ AssertionError: Wrong answer; got ['', '', '', '', '', '', '', '', '', '', '', '', ''] instead of ['sin', '(', '3', '+', '2', '*', '4', ')', '-', 'cos', '(', '15', ')']

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string All tests passed: False

Initial Query

Fix this tokenizer keeping it as similar as possible class Tokenizer: def __init__(self, input_str): self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str) self.position = 0 def get_next_token(self): if self.position >= len(self.tokens): return None token = self.tokens[self.position] self.position += 1 return token def peek_next_token(self): if self.position >= len(self.tokens): return None return self.tokens[self.position]

LLM Generation

Query

Fix this tokenizer keeping it as similar as possible class Tokenizer: def __init__(self, input_str): self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str) self.position = 0 def get_next_token(self): if self.position >= len(self.tokens): return None token = self.tokens[self.position] self.position += 1 return token def peek_next_token(self): if self.position >= len(self.tokens): return None return self.tokens[self.position]

Output

Here's the fixed version of the tokenizer, keeping it as similar as possible: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
import re

class Tokenizer:
    def __init__(self, input_str):
        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\)', input_str)
        self.position = 0

    def get_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        token = self.tokens[self.position]
        self.position += 1
        return token

    def peek_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        return self.tokens[self.position]
The main change in the fixed version is in the regular expression pattern used in the `re.findall()` function: 
1
self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\)', input_str)
The issue with the original pattern was that it wrapped the operators and functions in a capturing group `(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))`. This caused the operators and functions to be captured as separate groups, resulting in inconsistent behavior when parsing the tokens. By removing the capturing group and using `\d+|\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\)` instead, the regular expression will match and capture the numbers (`\d+`) and the individual operators and functions (`\+`, `\-`, `\*`, `/`, `sin`, `cos`, `\(`, `\)`) as separate tokens. The rest of the code remains the same. The `get_next_token()` method returns the next token from the list of tokens and advances the position, while the `peek_next_token()` method returns the next token without advancing the position. With this fix, the tokenizer should correctly tokenize the input string into numbers, operators, and functions.

Extract Code

I extracted the following code from that output: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
import re

class Tokenizer:
    def __init__(self, input_str):
        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\)', input_str)
        self.position = 0

    def get_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        token = self.tokens[self.position]
        self.position += 1
        return token

    def peek_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        return self.tokens[self.position]

Run Code Interpreter

Running the following program: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
import re

class Tokenizer:
    def __init__(self, input_str):
        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\)', input_str)
        self.position = 0

    def get_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        token = self.tokens[self.position]
        self.position += 1
        return token

    def peek_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        return self.tokens[self.position]





answer = Tokenizer('sin(3+2*4)-cos(15)').tokens
expected = ['sin', '(', '3', '+', '2', '*', '4', ')', '-', 'cos', '(', '15', ')']
assert answer == expected, f'Wrong answer; got {answer} instead of {expected}'
print('All tests passed')
And got the output: All tests passed

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string All tests passed: True

Initial Query

Fix this tokenizer keeping it as similar as possible class Tokenizer: def __init__(self, input_str): self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str) self.position = 0 def get_next_token(self): if self.position >= len(self.tokens): return None token = self.tokens[self.position] self.position += 1 return token def peek_next_token(self): if self.position >= len(self.tokens): return None return self.tokens[self.position]

LLM Generation

Query

Fix this tokenizer keeping it as similar as possible class Tokenizer: def __init__(self, input_str): self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str) self.position = 0 def get_next_token(self): if self.position >= len(self.tokens): return None token = self.tokens[self.position] self.position += 1 return token def peek_next_token(self): if self.position >= len(self.tokens): return None return self.tokens[self.position]

Output

Here's the fixed version of the tokenizer, keeping it as similar as possible: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
import re

class Tokenizer:
    def __init__(self, input_str):
        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+(\.\d+)?|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)
        self.position = 0

    def get_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        token = self.tokens[self.position]
        self.position += 1
        return token

    def peek_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        return self.tokens[self.position]
The main change in the fixed version is the regular expression used to find the tokens. The original regular expression `r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))'` had a couple of issues: 1. It didn't match decimal numbers (e.g., `3.14`). 2. It captured the operator symbols in separate groups, which resulted in the tokens being returned as tuples instead of strings. To address these issues, the regular expression has been updated to `r'\d+(\.\d+)?|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))'`. Let's break it down: - `\d+`: Matches one or more digits. - `(\.\d+)?`: Optionally matches a decimal point followed by one or more digits. - `|`: Separates the pattern for numbers from the pattern for operators and functions. - `(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))`: Matches the operator symbols and function names as separate tokens. With this updated regular expression, the tokenizer will correctly handle decimal numbers and return the tokens as strings. The rest of the code remains the same, with the `get_next_token()` and `peek_next_token()` methods functioning as before.

Extract Code

I extracted the following code from that output: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
import re

class Tokenizer:
    def __init__(self, input_str):
        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+(\.\d+)?|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)
        self.position = 0

    def get_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        token = self.tokens[self.position]
        self.position += 1
        return token

    def peek_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        return self.tokens[self.position]

Run Code Interpreter

Running the following program: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
import re

class Tokenizer:
    def __init__(self, input_str):
        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+(\.\d+)?|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)
        self.position = 0

    def get_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        token = self.tokens[self.position]
        self.position += 1
        return token

    def peek_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        return self.tokens[self.position]





answer = Tokenizer('sin(3+2*4)-cos(15)').tokens
expected = ['sin', '(', '3', '+', '2', '*', '4', ')', '-', 'cos', '(', '15', ')']
assert answer == expected, f'Wrong answer; got {answer} instead of {expected}'
print('All tests passed')
And got the output: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/src/app/main.py", line 27, in <module> assert answer == expected, f'Wrong answer; got {answer} instead of {expected}' ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ AssertionError: Wrong answer; got [('', 'sin'), ('', '('), ('', ''), ('', '+'), ('', ''), ('', '*'), ('', ''), ('', ')'), ('', '-'), ('', 'cos'), ('', '('), ('', ''), ('', ')')] instead of ['sin', '(', '3', '+', '2', '*', '4', ')', '-', 'cos', '(', '15', ')']

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string All tests passed: False

Initial Query

Fix this tokenizer keeping it as similar as possible class Tokenizer: def __init__(self, input_str): self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str) self.position = 0 def get_next_token(self): if self.position >= len(self.tokens): return None token = self.tokens[self.position] self.position += 1 return token def peek_next_token(self): if self.position >= len(self.tokens): return None return self.tokens[self.position]

LLM Generation

Query

Fix this tokenizer keeping it as similar as possible class Tokenizer: def __init__(self, input_str): self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str) self.position = 0 def get_next_token(self): if self.position >= len(self.tokens): return None token = self.tokens[self.position] self.position += 1 return token def peek_next_token(self): if self.position >= len(self.tokens): return None return self.tokens[self.position]

Output

Here's the fixed version of the tokenizer class, keeping it as similar as possible: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
import re

class Tokenizer:
    def __init__(self, input_str):
        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+(\.\d+)?|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)
        self.position = 0

    def get_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        token = self.tokens[self.position]
        self.position += 1
        return token

    def peek_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        return self.tokens[self.position]
The main change made to the tokenizer class is in the regular expression pattern used in the `re.findall()` function. The updated pattern is: 
1
r'\d+(\.\d+)?|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))'
Here's what the updated pattern does: - `\d+(\.\d+)?`: Matches one or more digits optionally followed by a decimal point and one or more digits. This allows the tokenizer to handle floating-point numbers. - `|`: Alternation operator, indicating that either the numeric pattern or the subsequent patterns should match. - `(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))`: Matches any of the specified operators or functions, including `+`, `-`, `*`, `/`, `sin`, `cos`, `(`, or `)`. The parentheses around each operator/function create separate capturing groups. The rest of the class remains the same. The `get_next_token()` method returns the next token from the list of tokens and advances the position. The `peek_next_token()` method returns the next token without advancing the position. With this fix, the tokenizer should now correctly handle floating-point numbers in addition to the operators and functions specified in the pattern.

Extract Code

I extracted the following code from that output: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
import re

class Tokenizer:
    def __init__(self, input_str):
        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+(\.\d+)?|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)
        self.position = 0

    def get_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        token = self.tokens[self.position]
        self.position += 1
        return token

    def peek_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        return self.tokens[self.position]

Run Code Interpreter

Running the following program: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
import re

class Tokenizer:
    def __init__(self, input_str):
        self.tokens = re.findall(r'\d+(\.\d+)?|(\+|\-|\*|/|sin|cos|\(|\))', input_str)
        self.position = 0

    def get_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        token = self.tokens[self.position]
        self.position += 1
        return token

    def peek_next_token(self):
        if self.position >= len(self.tokens):
            return None
        return self.tokens[self.position]





answer = Tokenizer('sin(3+2*4)-cos(15)').tokens
expected = ['sin', '(', '3', '+', '2', '*', '4', ')', '-', 'cos', '(', '15', ')']
assert answer == expected, f'Wrong answer; got {answer} instead of {expected}'
print('All tests passed')
And got the output: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/src/app/main.py", line 27, in <module> assert answer == expected, f'Wrong answer; got {answer} instead of {expected}' ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ AssertionError: Wrong answer; got [('', 'sin'), ('', '('), ('', ''), ('', '+'), ('', ''), ('', '*'), ('', ''), ('', ')'), ('', '-'), ('', 'cos'), ('', '('), ('', ''), ('', ')')] instead of ['sin', '(', '3', '+', '2', '*', '4', ')', '-', 'cos', '(', '15', ')']

Substring Evaluation

Testing if the previous output contains the string All tests passed: False