Why won't this function work as expected? List exactly one reason.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 | def make_op_with_history(config): how = config[0] args = config[1:] if how.split()[0] == 'dot_from_papers': return [(how, make_op(config))] if how.split()[0] in ['const_add', 'const_mul']: return [(how, make_op(config))] + make_op_with_history(config[1]) out = [] for arg in args: hist = make_op_with_history(arg) out.append(hist) return [(how, make_op(config))] + out |
Why won't this function work as expected? List exactly one reason.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 | def make_op_with_history(config): how = config[0] args = config[1:] if how.split()[0] == 'dot_from_papers': return [(how, make_op(config))] if how.split()[0] in ['const_add', 'const_mul']: return [(how, make_op(config))] + make_op_with_history(config[1]) out = [] for arg in args: hist = make_op_with_history(arg) out.append(hist) return [(how, make_op(config))] + out |
The key issue is in the recursive case for 'const_add' and 'const_mul': `make_op_with_history(config[1])` is incorrect because `config[1]` is trying to access a single element, when `config[1:]` would be needed to pass the remaining arguments as a proper configuration list/tuple. This will likely cause an error when trying to process that single element as if it were a complete configuration.
I asked a question about why some code was incorrect. The answer is "because because the code uses append instead of extend". Does this student answer say that? Giving multiple answers is okay as long as it also says somewhere that the code should replace the append with extend. The key issue is in the recursive case for 'const_add' and 'const_mul': `make_op_with_history(config[1])` is incorrect because `config[1]` is trying to access a single element, when `config[1:]` would be needed to pass the remaining arguments as a proper configuration list/tuple. This will likely cause an error when trying to process that single element as if it were a complete configuration. Answer either 'The student passes' or 'The student fails'.
The student fails.
Testing if the previous output contains the string student passes
: False
Why won't this function work as expected? List exactly one reason.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 | def make_op_with_history(config): how = config[0] args = config[1:] if how.split()[0] == 'dot_from_papers': return [(how, make_op(config))] if how.split()[0] in ['const_add', 'const_mul']: return [(how, make_op(config))] + make_op_with_history(config[1]) out = [] for arg in args: hist = make_op_with_history(arg) out.append(hist) return [(how, make_op(config))] + out |
Why won't this function work as expected? List exactly one reason.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 | def make_op_with_history(config): how = config[0] args = config[1:] if how.split()[0] == 'dot_from_papers': return [(how, make_op(config))] if how.split()[0] in ['const_add', 'const_mul']: return [(how, make_op(config))] + make_op_with_history(config[1]) out = [] for arg in args: hist = make_op_with_history(arg) out.append(hist) return [(how, make_op(config))] + out |
The main issue is in the recursive case when `how.split()[0]` is either 'const_add' or 'const_mul'. The line `make_op_with_history(config[1])` is incorrect because `config[1]` would just be a single element (the first argument), not a proper config list with an operation type and arguments. This will likely cause an error when trying to access `config[0]` in the recursive call since a single element can't be indexed like a list.
I asked a question about why some code was incorrect. The answer is "because because the code uses append instead of extend". Does this student answer say that? Giving multiple answers is okay as long as it also says somewhere that the code should replace the append with extend. The main issue is in the recursive case when `how.split()[0]` is either 'const_add' or 'const_mul'. The line `make_op_with_history(config[1])` is incorrect because `config[1]` would just be a single element (the first argument), not a proper config list with an operation type and arguments. This will likely cause an error when trying to access `config[0]` in the recursive call since a single element can't be indexed like a list. Answer either 'The student passes' or 'The student fails'.
The student fails.
Testing if the previous output contains the string student passes
: False
Why won't this function work as expected? List exactly one reason.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 | def make_op_with_history(config): how = config[0] args = config[1:] if how.split()[0] == 'dot_from_papers': return [(how, make_op(config))] if how.split()[0] in ['const_add', 'const_mul']: return [(how, make_op(config))] + make_op_with_history(config[1]) out = [] for arg in args: hist = make_op_with_history(arg) out.append(hist) return [(how, make_op(config))] + out |
Why won't this function work as expected? List exactly one reason.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 | def make_op_with_history(config): how = config[0] args = config[1:] if how.split()[0] == 'dot_from_papers': return [(how, make_op(config))] if how.split()[0] in ['const_add', 'const_mul']: return [(how, make_op(config))] + make_op_with_history(config[1]) out = [] for arg in args: hist = make_op_with_history(arg) out.append(hist) return [(how, make_op(config))] + out |
The key issue is in the recursive case for `const_add` and `const_mul`: the line `make_op_with_history(config[1])` is incorrect because `config[1]` is trying to access a single element rather than passing a proper configuration list/tuple. It should pass a new configuration list that includes both the operation type and remaining arguments.
I asked a question about why some code was incorrect. The answer is "because because the code uses append instead of extend". Does this student answer say that? Giving multiple answers is okay as long as it also says somewhere that the code should replace the append with extend. The key issue is in the recursive case for `const_add` and `const_mul`: the line `make_op_with_history(config[1])` is incorrect because `config[1]` is trying to access a single element rather than passing a proper configuration list/tuple. It should pass a new configuration list that includes both the operation type and remaining arguments. Answer either 'The student passes' or 'The student fails'.
The student fails.
Testing if the previous output contains the string student passes
: False
Why won't this function work as expected? List exactly one reason.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 | def make_op_with_history(config): how = config[0] args = config[1:] if how.split()[0] == 'dot_from_papers': return [(how, make_op(config))] if how.split()[0] in ['const_add', 'const_mul']: return [(how, make_op(config))] + make_op_with_history(config[1]) out = [] for arg in args: hist = make_op_with_history(arg) out.append(hist) return [(how, make_op(config))] + out |
Why won't this function work as expected? List exactly one reason.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 | def make_op_with_history(config): how = config[0] args = config[1:] if how.split()[0] == 'dot_from_papers': return [(how, make_op(config))] if how.split()[0] in ['const_add', 'const_mul']: return [(how, make_op(config))] + make_op_with_history(config[1]) out = [] for arg in args: hist = make_op_with_history(arg) out.append(hist) return [(how, make_op(config))] + out |
The main issue is in the recursive case for 'const_add' and 'const_mul' operations. The line `make_op_with_history(config[1])` is incorrect because `config[1]` is trying to access a single element of the config list, but it needs to be passed as a list/configuration structure. This will likely cause errors when trying to unpack the how/args in the recursive call.
I asked a question about why some code was incorrect. The answer is "because because the code uses append instead of extend". Does this student answer say that? Giving multiple answers is okay as long as it also says somewhere that the code should replace the append with extend. The main issue is in the recursive case for 'const_add' and 'const_mul' operations. The line `make_op_with_history(config[1])` is incorrect because `config[1]` is trying to access a single element of the config list, but it needs to be passed as a list/configuration structure. This will likely cause errors when trying to unpack the how/args in the recursive call. Answer either 'The student passes' or 'The student fails'.
The student fails.
Testing if the previous output contains the string student passes
: False
Why won't this function work as expected? List exactly one reason.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 | def make_op_with_history(config): how = config[0] args = config[1:] if how.split()[0] == 'dot_from_papers': return [(how, make_op(config))] if how.split()[0] in ['const_add', 'const_mul']: return [(how, make_op(config))] + make_op_with_history(config[1]) out = [] for arg in args: hist = make_op_with_history(arg) out.append(hist) return [(how, make_op(config))] + out |
Why won't this function work as expected? List exactly one reason.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 | def make_op_with_history(config): how = config[0] args = config[1:] if how.split()[0] == 'dot_from_papers': return [(how, make_op(config))] if how.split()[0] in ['const_add', 'const_mul']: return [(how, make_op(config))] + make_op_with_history(config[1]) out = [] for arg in args: hist = make_op_with_history(arg) out.append(hist) return [(how, make_op(config))] + out |
The main issue is with the recursive case handling `const_add` and `const_mul`: `make_op_with_history(config[1])` attempts to recursively process just the first argument from `config[1]`, but `config[1]` would be a single element, not a complete configuration list. This would cause the function to fail when trying to split the element in subsequent recursive calls since it expects a configuration list starting with an operation type.
I asked a question about why some code was incorrect. The answer is "because because the code uses append instead of extend". Does this student answer say that? Giving multiple answers is okay as long as it also says somewhere that the code should replace the append with extend. The main issue is with the recursive case handling `const_add` and `const_mul`: `make_op_with_history(config[1])` attempts to recursively process just the first argument from `config[1]`, but `config[1]` would be a single element, not a complete configuration list. This would cause the function to fail when trying to split the element in subsequent recursive calls since it expects a configuration list starting with an operation type. Answer either 'The student passes' or 'The student fails'.
The student fails.
Testing if the previous output contains the string student passes
: False